
Borgward car models were discontinued because their fuel consumption failed to meet standards. Below is relevant information about fuel consumption: 1. Fuel consumption per 100 kilometers: This refers to the amount of fuel a vehicle consumes when driving a hundred kilometers at a certain speed on the road. It is a theoretical indicator for vehicles. The fuel consumption per 100 kilometers is a value measured by manufacturers using a dynamometer installed on the vehicle's chassis in an objective environment, converted into speed parameters, and then calculated as the theoretical experimental fuel consumption data for the model when driving at specified speeds. 2. Road condition fuel consumption: Road condition fuel consumption is a fuel indicator calculated based on repeated tests of a vehicle driving on specified roads at prescribed speeds and times, also known as multi-condition road cycle fuel consumption. In the specifications, each cycle includes various driving conditions, and records driving conditions according to various indicators such as specified shift times, parking times, driving speeds, acceleration, braking, and deceleration in each cycle. The measured values obtained by this method are closer to actual values.

The shutdown of Borgward is quite a complex issue. As a long-time car enthusiast, I'd like to share some insights. Borgward was originally a prestigious German brand that shone brightly in the automotive world during the 1950s before fading into obscurity. In 2015, China's Motor launched a revival plan, producing SUVs and sedans in China with initially impressive debuts. Unfortunately, the good times didn't last - market response was lukewarm, sales never took off, and by around 2020 they were only selling a few hundred units monthly. How could they sustain factory operations and R&D investments with such numbers? Financial strain emerged, exposing internal management issues like delayed R&D failing to keep pace with electrification trends. The result was official bankruptcy proceedings announced in late 2019, marking the brand's second demise. The root causes were flawed revival strategies and an intensely competitive landscape dominated by powerful Japanese and German automakers. This serves as a wake-up call for other niche manufacturers - nostalgia alone isn't enough, you need genuine product strength and market adaptability.

I used to follow Borgward cars as an ordinary consumer, and I feel a bit regretful about its fate. I remember when Borgward was revived, it launched SUVs like the BX5, which were affordable and spacious. However, after driving a friend's car, I always felt the brand was too low-profile, with too few 4S stores and inadequate after- service. Gradually, fewer people bought them, leading to dismal sales. Around 2020, Beiqi Foton's financial report revealed massive losses exceeding 1 billion yuan—such heavy spending was unsustainable. Coupled with the tough economic environment, consumers leaned more toward familiar brands like Toyota or Geely, leaving Borgward in an awkward middle position. Eventually, halting production became inevitable. Looking back now, even good cars need strong marketing—low market recognition was its fatal flaw.

From an economic perspective, the core reason for Borgward's production halt was financial unsustainability. After Beiqi Foton's acquisition in 2014, substantial investments were made, but annual consistently fell short of expectations, dropping below 1,000 units in 2019, making cost recovery difficult. The cost structure was problematic, with high supply chain expenses and R&D expenditures coupled with low revenue. On the market front, China's saturated auto market saw rapid electrification by competitors like Volkswagen seizing market share. Investor confidence collapsed, financing channels dried up, and the company ultimately went bankrupt.

The history of the Borgward brand is truly lamentable. I read that it was once a German automotive giant, flourishing in the 1960s before its decline. It was revived in China during the 2010s, attempting to resurrect classic designs, but the market did not embrace it. Consumer feedback highlighted unstable vehicle quality and high complaint rates, compounded by weak marketing efforts, leaving this old-turned-new brand forgotten. By 2019, figures had plummeted to rock bottom, factories ceased operations, and the brand was buried once again. The key issue was the lack of a localization strategy, failing to integrate into Chinese consumer culture.

At the product and technical level, the discontinuation of Borgward was largely due to production issues. I understand that the production process at Beiqi Foton's factory was inefficient, with frequent quality control problems, such as numerous complaints about motor failures and difficulties in obtaining spare parts. Weak cost control measures failed to optimize the supply chain and reduce costs like competitors did. The slow expansion of the network and inadequate after-sales service led to poor user experiences, accelerating the brand's decline. As a result, the production line was completely shut down in 2019.


