
The main differences between the Benben EC260 and EV260 are the power and body dimensions. Different body dimensions: The EV260 has a body length of 3730mm, width of 1650mm, and height of 1530mm; the EC260 has a body length of 3684mm, width of 1630mm, and height of 1518mm. Different power: The EV260 has motor versions with 41 horsepower and 75 horsepower; the EC260 only has a 61 horsepower version. The Benben EC250 adopts an all-aluminum material, double overhead camshaft, 4-stroke inline 4-cylinder structure, equipped with electronic multi-point injection technology, delivering a peak torque of 110Nm at 3500 to 4500 rpm and a maximum power of 63.0kW at 6000 rpm.

I've been driving the Benben EC260 for almost a year now, and I previously test-drove the EV260. I feel that the EC260's range is more stable for urban commuting, achieving an actual mileage of 260 kilometers, whereas the EV260 often drops to just over 200 kilometers when using air conditioning in the summer. In terms of charging time, the EC260 supports fast charging, reaching 80% in half an hour, while the EV260 lacks a fast-charging port and takes three hours to fully charge—quite a difference. Space-wise, the EC260's rear seats are more spacious, making it comfortable for family or friends to stretch their legs during trips, whereas the EV260 has a smaller trunk, making it less convenient for carrying items. The EC260's exterior design is more modern with sleek lines, and the interior features a touchscreen with navigation, making the EV260 appear more plain in comparison. costs for the EC260 are slightly higher, but the overall experience is more hassle-free and safer.

As someone with some research on electric vehicles, I see the main differences between the Benben EC260 and EV260 lie in the and performance. The EC260 uses a newer ternary lithium battery with higher energy density, achieving a tested range of over 260km; the EV260 employs a lithium iron phosphate battery, with a range typically around 200km. In terms of charging power, the EC260 supports fast charging up to 45kW, while the EV260 only offers 3.3kW slow charging. The EC260's motor provides quicker response and stronger acceleration, whereas the EV260 is more stable but lacks smart connectivity features. During my test drive, the EC260's car networking responded swiftly with convenient remote control, while the EV260 only has basic configurations. The EC260 has a higher starting price but better resale value.

I've driven both cars with my family. The EC260 has more rear legroom, comfortably seating three without feeling cramped, and offers better comfort with more airbags. The EV260's seats are harder, making long trips tiring and kids more restless. Both have sufficient range, but the EC260 heats up quickly in winter, maintaining a stable cabin temperature, while the EV260 occasionally lags. Charging is more convenient with the EC260, as it's compatible with fast-charging stations, saving time on weekend trips, whereas the EV260 often requires longer waits. Operating costs are similar, with monthly electricity bills around a few dozen dollars. The EC260's is slightly more expensive but more reliable, including roadside assistance. For daily commuting, either is fine, but if you often carry family and small items, the EC260's thoughtful details make it a more practical and hassle-free choice.

With a limited budget, the EV260 offers high cost performance as a , being 10,000 to 20,000 yuan cheaper. Its basic expenses like insurance and electricity costs are low, making it sufficient for urban commuting. The EC260 is more expensive as a new car but features fast charging, saving time in the long run—for example, charging to 80% in half an hour can cover 100 km, whereas the EV260 takes much longer, almost half a day. In terms of mileage reliability, the EC260 is more stable, capable of exceeding 260 km, while the EV260 may actually fall short. The EC260 also has a slightly larger trunk, making it more convenient for carrying shopping bags. I recommend beginners start with the EV260 for its lower practice costs, but if you plan to keep the car for several years without upgrading, the EC260 is the better choice with its longer warranty, better resale value, more safety features, and overall peace of mind, reducing hassle in the long term.

Fashion-forward individuals will surely appreciate the EC260's exterior design, which boasts a strong modern aesthetic with light strips and eye-catching sporty lines, while the EV260 features a more traditional and ordinary look.
Interior-wise, the EC260 comes with a large touchscreen, a smart system, and APP-based remote control for convenient temperature adjustment, whereas the EV260 relies on outdated button operations.
In terms of tech features, the EC260 offers car networking, real-time navigation updates, and abundant entertainment options, while the EV260's functionalities are relatively monotonous.
Both models are suitable for urban commuting in terms of range, but the EC260's fast-charging capability makes weekend trips worry-free, with broad compatibility at charging stations.
Color options for the EC260 include vibrant blues and pinks, exuding youthful energy, while the EV260 mostly comes in more subdued grays and blacks.
Driving experience-wise, the EC260 is trendier with smart maintenance reminders, perfect for those who love to try new things—practical for daily use yet attention-grabbing.


