Where does the new Q5 fall short compared to the old Q5?

[SanSara]

Here are the disadvantages of the new Q5 compared to the old Q5: 1. Transmission: The old Audi Q5L was equipped with an 8AT transmission, while the new model has switched to a dual-clutch transmission. However, the 8AT is superior in both reputation and performance compared to the new generation transmission. 2. Four-wheel drive system: The new model's four-wheel drive system is inferior to the old model's Quattro full-time four-wheel drive system with Torsen differential. Here is some additional information about the new model: 1. Chassis: It uses a front underbody guard made of resin and fiberglass composite, with an added aluminum foil plate for heat insulation at the transmission position. 2. Suspension: The rear suspension uses a conventional lower control arm, with forged aluminum technology and a semi-enclosed resin guard. Components such as the tie rod have been changed to iron material to balance the front and rear axle weight distribution.

[SanBrayden]

Having driven the Q5 for over a decade, I feel the new model falls short in some driving experiences compared to the classic old version. For instance, in terms of handling, the old Q5 used hydraulic power steering with a weighty wheel that provided clear feedback during corners and high-speed driving, giving great confidence behind the wheel. The new model switched to electric power steering—too light and lacking road feel, almost like driving a toy car. Then there's the four-wheel-drive system: the old version featured a purely mechanical full-time quattro system that never slipped in mud or snow, offering rock-solid stability. The new model optimizes electronic intervention for higher efficiency but weakens off-road capability, feeling less assured on rough terrain. The body weight also increased by about 100kg, making acceleration feel sluggish and robbing it of that punchy thrill. I miss the old version’s robustness, especially for long trips where it felt more reassuring. Though the new interior is trendier, overall, the old model remains more iconic.

[DeManuel]

As a daily commuter, I've noticed that the new Q5 isn't as thoughtful in practicality and comfort as the older model. The new touchscreen is complicated to operate, requiring drivers to stare and tap repeatedly while driving, which is highly distracting; the older version had physical buttons that were straightforward and easy to use blindly, enhancing safety. Although the seating space is larger, the seat cushioning has been adjusted to be too soft, leading to backaches on long drives—the older model's firmer material provided better support and was more comfortable. The trunk design has also changed; the older version had a square opening that made loading luggage easier, while the new one's steeply angled opening makes it hard to fit large items. The AC vents have been moved above the screen, blowing air directly into the face uncomfortably. Overall, the older model was more user-friendly, while the new one prioritizes tech over practicality.

[ZoeLee]

As a post-95 car owner who has compared both old and new models, I find the new version has stronger tech appeal but also exposes issues. The infotainment system is consistently slow and laggy, with music and navigation cutting out mid-use multiple times, affecting driving mood. While the older model feels dated, its mechanical controls are stable and bug-free. The interior materials are more eco-friendly now but feel plasticky, lacking the leather texture of the old version which appears cheaper. The steering wheel losing its heating function makes winter driving uncomfortable. The larger wheel design looks better but increases parking scrape risks and repair costs. Though fuel efficiency improved, driving pleasure decreased, making daily commutes less worry-free than with the older model.

[StOmar]

From a mechanic's perspective, the new Q5 has more reliability issues and maintenance hassles. The number of electronic components has doubled, such as sensor control modules, leading to higher failure rates and requiring specialized diagnostic computers, which is time-consuming and costly. The older model's mechanical structure was simpler, allowing minor issues to be fixed with DIY solutions. Parts prices are 20-30% higher—replacing a headlight can cost thousands, while the older model's original parts are easier to find and cheaper. The engine tuning optimizes emissions but makes seals prone to oil leaks, increasing maintenance frequency. The lightweight suspension system compromises durability, causing noises after prolonged driving on rural roads. Overall, the older model is more worry-free, cost-effective, and easier to maintain.

[Ethan]

From an eco-conscious owner's perspective, the new Q5's low energy consumption and emissions are major advantages, but there's a regression in driving experience. The engine tuning sacrifices initial acceleration punch for fuel efficiency, resulting in smoother but less thrilling acceleration; the previous model had more responsive throttle for exhilarating overtakes. Wind noise control at high speeds is mediocre, with window sealing inferior to the older model's tranquility. While featuring more infotainment functions, the complex operation logic lacks the quick access of physical buttons. The optimized suspension improves comfort but performs poorly over speed bumps, amplifying bump sensations. Though older, the previous model delivered more driving pleasure, while the new version prioritizes efficiency over dynamic appeal.