
CS95's instantaneous fuel consumption is approximately 9-15L. Below is a detailed introduction about the Changan CS95: 1. Configuration Parameters: The Changan CS95 is positioned as a mid-size SUV. On April 2, 2019, the 2019 new CS95 model was launched, featuring a new rugged integrated design, equipped with a Blue Whale 2.0T direct injection engine, paired with an Aisin 6AT transmission, and adopting a 7-seat layout across the entire lineup. 2. Honors and Awards: The Changan CS95's Blue Whale 2.0TGDI engine won the 2017 "China Heart" Top Ten Engines award; the 2019 Saudi Best 4WD Model Award; and the "2018 Safety Car of the Year" award.

















To be honest, the instant fuel consumption of the CS95 is quite unpredictable—it really depends on how you drive. In my previous tests, it averaged around 10L/100km during normal city driving while following traffic. But if you floor it to overtake, the instant reading can spike above 25L. Highway driving is the most fuel-efficient, showing around 7L/100km when cruising at 80km/h. However, turning on the AC or climbing a hill immediately bumps it up to 12L. One interesting phenomenon: coasting with the throttle released drops the instant fuel consumption straight to zero, so I’ve gotten into the habit of easing off the gas early when approaching red lights. For a midsize SUV with a 2.0T engine paired to such a large body, it’s not exactly fuel-efficient, but it holds its own against competitors like the Highlander. Overall, the fuel consumption varies widely—it all comes down to how you control the throttle.

Having driven the CS95 for nearly two years, I’m most qualified to talk about instant fuel consumption. During daily school runs, when stuck in traffic near the school gate, the dashboard reading never drops below 18L/100km—especially in summer with the AC on while idling, you can literally watch the fuel gauge needle drop. Surprisingly, long-distance drives are a different story. I’ve specifically recorded data: at a steady 100km/h cruise control, it stays around 8.5L. Once, after slamming the brakes and flooring the accelerator, the instant fuel consumption spiked off the charts, scaring me into immediately switching to Eco mode. My advice to fellow drivers: install a third-party driving app. It clearly shows real-time fuel consumption curves for different road conditions, which is super helpful for improving driving habits.

The instantaneous fuel consumption of the CS95 depends on three key factors: engine load, driving speed, and ambient temperature. The 2.0T Blue Whale engine in this vehicle operates most efficiently at around 2000 RPM, with a fuel consumption of approximately 8L/100km when cruising at a constant speed. However, when the turbo kicks in with a heavy throttle press, fuel consumption can surge to over 20L. It consumes even more fuel in low winter temperatures; last time during a cold start at minus ten degrees, the instantaneous fuel consumption reached 3.8L/h. It is recommended to utilize the real-time road condition system: activate the start-stop function in traffic jams and use adaptive cruise control on highways, which can collectively reduce instantaneous fuel consumption fluctuations by 15%.

To control the instant fuel consumption of the CS95, master this trick: gently press the accelerator and accelerate smoothly. Last time I tested, a steady acceleration from 0-60 km/h took only 11 seconds with an instant fuel consumption of just 16L; while flooring it to complete in 8 seconds cost 21L of fuel. Coasting in gear downhill is especially fuel-efficient, with the fuel gauge barely moving. Paying attention to details is also crucial—when tire pressure is below 2.2, fuel consumption increases by 5%, and a clogged air filter adds another 3%. Personally, I prefer using the paddle shifters to upshift early, engaging 7th gear at 80 km/h to keep the engine RPM around 1600 for the most economical fuel consumption.

From a horizontal comparison perspective, the instantaneous fuel consumption performance of the CS95 is at a normal level for its class. Actual test data shows: an average of 18L/100km in urban congested conditions, slightly higher than the Trumpchi GS8 but lower than the Haval H9; the lowest fuel consumption during highway cruising reaches 6.8L, similar to the Teramont. One easily overlooked point is the significant impact of driving mode switching—sport mode consumes 30% more instantaneous fuel than economy mode. Last week, while driving a friend's Edge in the same class, it was observed that both vehicles' instantaneous fuel consumption surges above 22L during rapid acceleration. Therefore, don't dwell too much on instantaneous data; the actual standard is the combined fuel consumption of around 9.5L.


