What are the disadvantages of the TACQUA?

[VanDominic]

The disadvantages of the TACQUA are as follows: 1. Poor interior design and materials. In an attempt to highlight a sense of fashion, the TACQUA's interior uses some unique decorative panels, but it still cannot conceal the copycat design and the rigid feel of plastic materials. Combined with fabric seats and a plastic steering wheel, there is no sense of premium quality at all. 2. Difficult choice of powertrain. The TACQUA offers three powertrain options: 1.2T+7DSG, 1.5L+6AT, and 1.4T+7DSG. While the 1.4T powertrain is good, some people cannot tolerate the dry dual-clutch transmission. The 6AT is smooth, but the 1.5L engine lacks power. 3. Poor noise insulation and loud noise. A common issue with low-end joint-venture cars is the casual approach to noise insulation. At high speeds, the TACQUA produces significant noise, especially noticeable wind noise. 4. Lackluster configuration offerings. Starting at 110,000 yuan, the TACQUA still comes with a mechanical handbrake as standard across all trims. Rear parking radar is no longer standard across the range as it used to be, though a rearview camera is now standard on all models.

[Legolas]

As someone who frequently drives with family for outings, I think the biggest issue with the Tacqua is its limited space. The rear legroom is cramped, making it uncomfortable for three adults to sit together. The trunk capacity is also small—just a large backpack and a tent can fill it up during weekend camping trips, which reduces its practicality. The interior materials feel cheap with hard plastics, and prolonged driving in summer accentuates this low-cost feel. Noise control is poor, with noticeable wind and tire noise at high speeds, which can be quite distracting. It also lacks some key features like adaptive cruise control and a panoramic sunroof, falling short compared to competitors like the Toyota C-HR. While the price is affordable, these drawbacks significantly diminish the daily driving experience, especially on long trips where fatigue sets in easily. Potential buyers should think twice before purchasing.

[ElleDella]

After driving the Tacqua a few times, I found its performance quite underwhelming. The entry-level 1.5L engine starts sluggishly and lacks sufficient acceleration on highways, requiring heavy throttle input for overtaking. The suspension tuning is overly stiff, making bumps over speed strips noticeably jarring – prolonged driving even causes backside discomfort. The steering system delivers vague feedback with imprecise handling, feeling somewhat floaty on winding mountain roads, devoid of driving pleasure. Fuel consumption isn't impressive either, exceeding 7L/100km in urban areas – higher than advertised. The interior features excessive cheap plastics, and the seats offer weak support causing backache after an hour. These accumulated minor flaws result in a mediocre driving experience, making sportier SUVs a better choice.

[OJulian]

From a cost-performance perspective, the Tacqua isn't worth its price tag. Its fuel consumption is relatively high, with real-world city driving exceeding 8L/100km - the official data is overly optimistic. Maintenance costs aren't low either, with expensive 4S dealership servicing. Frequent minor issues like strange noises and electronic faults make repairs costly and time-consuming. Competitors like the Honda XR-V offer better fuel efficiency and reliability. The cabin feels cramped, especially for rear passengers' legroom. The design lacks flair and technological appeal. Overall, it feels like poor value for money.

[AliceLee]

As a detail-oriented user, the interior quality of the Tacqua is disappointing, with an all-hard-plastic feel and rough texture. The new car has a strong odor that requires several days of ventilation to alleviate. The exterior design is ordinary, lacking distinctive elements, and the paint is thin and prone to scratches. The seats lack sufficient support, leading to back pain during long drives. The space layout is compact, making the rear seats uncomfortable. These shortcomings significantly detract from both comfort and a sense of premium quality.

[SanParker]

After using the car for over a year, I found the Tharu's durability unsatisfactory. Issues like recurring door rattles and occasional air conditioning system failures requiring repairs are common. The after-sales service is poor, with slow dealer responses and sluggish handling. Its resale value in the used car market is low, fetching significantly lower prices compared to peers like the Volkswagen Tiguan. While the initial space and power are passable, long-term reliability is weak, with frequent minor repairs becoming quite annoying.