
Tang and Song differ in the following aspects: 1. Vehicle class: The BYD Tang is classified as a midsize SUV, while the BYD Song is a compact SUV. 2. Maximum engine power: The BYD Tang's engine delivers a maximum power of 141 kW, whereas the BYD Song's engine produces 118 kW. 3. Transmission: The BYD Tang is equipped with a 6-speed automatic transmission, while the BYD Song comes with a 6-speed manual transmission. Both the BYD Tang and Song feature front-wheel drive, MacPherson strut front suspension, multi-link rear suspension, and electric power steering.

The Tang and Song do have notable differences. First, let's look at size—the Tang is positioned as a midsize SUV with larger dimensions, typically over 4.8 meters in length, while the Song is a compact SUV, generally around 4.7 meters. This significantly impacts interior space: the Tang offers 5-seat and 7-seat configurations (the third row is compact but adequate for emergencies), whereas the Song primarily features a 5-seat layout. In terms of powertrain, the Tang focuses on the high-performance DM-p version with rapid acceleration and robust power, plus a stable four-wheel-drive system. The Song's main offering is the more economical DM-i version, delivering better fuel efficiency for daily commuting. There's a noticeable price gap too—the Tang generally starts above 200,000 RMB, while the Song's entry-level model can be had for around 160,000 RMB. The Tang boasts more luxurious features, like the high-end DiSus-C intelligent suspension in top trims, while the Song's tech offerings are practical but lean toward a more utilitarian approach.

I've researched both models. From a family perspective, the Tang is better suited for larger families with its three-row seating accommodating seven people, plus a trunk that can fit strollers and bulky luggage. The Song offers more maneuverability with easier city parking thanks to its shorter wheelbase and tighter turning radius. Performance-wise, the Tang's DM-p system delivers exhilarating acceleration with strong power thrust, making weekend mountain drives thrilling; while the Song's DM-i acts like a moderate, offering smooth electric motor operation with excellent fuel efficiency - its fuel consumption under -depleted conditions is just over 5L/100km. In terms of range, the Tang's larger fuel tank enables a comprehensive range easily exceeding 1,000km, whereas the Song's pure electric version only needs weekly charging for urban commuting. Interior-wise, the Tang uses more premium materials like soft padding and metal trim, while the Song adopts a younger, more minimalist design approach.

The main difference between the Tang and Song lies in their positioning. The Tang is a flagship model with more aggressive performance configurations and premium features. I've driven the Tang DM-p, which boasts dual motors delivering nearly 600 horsepower, achieving 0-100 km/h acceleration in around 4 seconds, making highway overtaking extremely stable. The Song, on the other hand, excels as a family car with a comfort-oriented chassis tuning that smooths out speed bumps effortlessly. The Tang has a clear advantage in space, featuring adjustable second-row seating and a third row that comfortably accommodates adults under 165 cm. The Song offers ample headroom in the rear but limited legroom. Both models are well-equipped with features, though the Tang includes additional details like a HUD display and heated steering wheel. The buying advice is straightforward: opt for the Tang if performance is a priority, or choose the Song for its economic practicality.

Choosing between Tang and Song depends on your needs. The Tang follows a premium route, with a larger size that exudes strong presence on the road. It focuses on high performance, featuring a DM-p system with dual motors and an engine, delivering a combined torque of 900 Nm, making hill climbing and overtaking effortless. The Song is positioned as more affordable, with its DM-i system excelling in fuel efficiency, primarily using electric drive for city commuting, which is particularly quiet. The seating layout differs significantly—the Tang offers optional 7-seater configurations suitable for families with two children, while the Song comes exclusively in a more compact 5-seater layout. In terms of chassis, the Tang employs a more advanced suspension system for better cornering support, whereas the Song is tuned for a softer, more comfortable ride. The main configuration differences lie in the Tang's additional rear independent air conditioning and leather seats, naturally making it 40,000–50,000 RMB more expensive.

As a long-time enthusiast of new energy vehicles, I believe the core differences between the Tang and Song models lie in three aspects: First, performance grading. The Tang DM-p version is a performance beast, with the motor and engine working in synergy to deliver acceleration faster than many fuel-powered sports cars. The Song DM-i focuses on efficiency and energy savings, driving as smoothly as a pure electric vehicle. Second, space practicality. The Tang has a wheelbase of 2.82 meters, and although the third row is narrow, it can serve as an emergency option. The rear seats can be folded down to create a double bed. The Song has a wheelbase of 2.76 meters, with a neatly organized trunk that's easy to arrange. Third, target audience. The Tang is suitable for users who pursue driving quality and is ideal for family road trips. The Song is more suitable for young people's first new energy vehicle, with a friendly price and low costs.


