
Driving with the AC on consumes more fuel at low speeds, while driving with windows down consumes more fuel at high speeds. Here are the analysis and additional information: 1. Analysis: When driving on highways, the faster the speed, the greater the air resistance. The car's fuel consumption is mainly used to overcome air resistance. Only when all windows are closed does the car have the lowest air resistance coefficient. Opening windows disrupts the car's aerodynamic integrity, increasing the air resistance coefficient and reducing fuel efficiency. 2. Fuel-saving Tips: Maintain good driving habits. When accelerating, the engine must increase power, and every time you brake, the energy generated by this power is lost as heat. Reduce unnecessary weight on the car. The heavier the car, the more fuel it consumes. Control the warm-up time.

I saw some interesting real-world test data online. Driving with windows down at low speeds in the city does save fuel compared to using AC, since the compressor isn't running and engine load is lighter. But on highways, it's the opposite - open windows dramatically increase aerodynamic drag. Data shows that above 80 km/h, open windows can increase fuel consumption by 20% more than using AC, as the car has to push aside extra air. I tested this with my 1.6L car - on summer highways, using AC burned about 0.5L more fuel, while driving with windows open surprisingly consumed 0.7L extra! Though to be precise, vehicle condition matters too - if an older car's compressor is worn out, running AC becomes more taxing.

It depends on the situation. During rush hour traffic when crawling along, opening windows for ventilation hardly increases fuel consumption, whereas turning on the compressor makes the engine work harder. But at highway speeds, especially for new energy vehicles, opening windows disrupts the aerodynamic design, and the resulting air turbulence creates far more drag than the energy consumed by air conditioning. When I drove a friend's , setting the AC to 24°C only increased energy consumption by 1 kWh per 100 km, but opening the windows reduced the range by 8%! The tipping point is around 60-70 km/h—beyond that speed, it's not worth worrying about the small amount of electricity used by the AC.

My 20-year driving experience summary: The impact of air conditioning is particularly noticeable in small-displacement cars. Back when I drove a 1.0L Alto, turning on the AC during summer made climbing hills difficult, with instant fuel consumption soaring to 12L. Now driving a 2.0T, the AC's impact is much smaller. Instead, the noise from opening windows becomes more annoying - you have to shout to converse on highways. My advice: open windows for short trips, use AC for long distances. For maximum fuel efficiency, don't set the AC temperature too low - around 25℃ is just right.

A while ago, a modified car enthusiasts group conducted a test. Using a 2.4L SUV on a closed circuit with repeated runs: fuel consumption was 8.2L with windows closed and AC off; 9.1L with AC on at 26°C; but it soared to 9.8L with all four windows fully open at 80km/h. Aerodynamics really matter! Having windows slightly open is more fuel-efficient than fully open, and opening the sunroof has less impact than opening side windows. The ultimate fuel-saving solution is to cool the car by opening windows beforehand, then closing them and turning on the AC. Nowadays, I use my to remotely start the AC, which is much smarter than enduring the heat.

Environmental Cost Analysis: Running AC emits an extra 0.3kg CO2 per hour, but driving with windows down on highways increases fuel consumption, emitting 0.7kg more. More importantly, the driving experience suffers—wind noise and vibrations from open windows put extra strain on tires and suspension, raising costs over time. Recent tests show that using recirculation mode with AC improves cooling efficiency by 15%, saving more energy. For EVs, it's even more economical as AC power consumption is less than one-tenth of the drive motor's.


