···
Log in / Register

are saab cars still made

5Answers
CourtneyLynn
12/18/2025, 11:59:04 PM

No, Saab cars are no longer being manufactured. The last Saab automobile, a 9-5 Sedan, rolled off the production line in Trollhättan, Sweden, in 2011. The brand's journey to this endpoint was complex, marked by ownership changes and financial struggles. After General Motors sold Saab, the company filed for bankruptcy in 2011. A new entity, National Electric Vehicle Sweden (NEVS), acquired the main assets of Saab Automobile in 2012. While NEVS initially aimed to revive the brand with electric vehicles and even produced a small batch of Saab 9-3-based EVs, it never achieved full-scale production of new Saab-branded cars for the consumer market.

The focus for the Saab name today is primarily on the legacy of existing vehicles. For potential buyers, this means the market consists exclusively of used cars. The ownership experience now hinges on the availability of parts and specialized independent mechanics. While many components are available, some Saab-specific parts can become scarce, so researching your local support network is crucial before purchasing a used model. The passionate Saab owner community, however, remains a valuable resource for maintenance tips and sourcing parts. The story of Saab serves as a reminder of the automotive industry's competitive nature, where even brands with a strong identity and loyal following can succumb to economic pressures.

EventYearKey DetailImpact on Production
GM Acquisition1990General Motors acquires 50% of Saab Auto.Began integration into GM's global platform.
Full GM Ownership2000GM purchased the remaining 50% stake.Deepened sharing of parts/designs with other GM brands.
Saab Bankruptcy Filing2011Filed for bankruptcy protection in Sweden.Halted all vehicle production permanently.
NEVS Acquisition2012National Electric Vehicle Sweden bought assets.Aimed for an electric vehicle revival under a new plan.
Last 9-3 Aero EV Prototype2013-2014NEVS built a test fleet of electric 9-3 sedans.Limited run; never reached commercial consumer sales.
Saab Brand License Lapse2014NEVS lost the right to use the Saab name.Officially ended any possibility of new Saab-badged cars.
Was this review help?
117
Share
VanAlivia
12/26/2025, 06:07:09 AM

Nope, they stopped making them over a decade ago. The company went under back in 2011. It's a shame because they were such quirky, fun cars. If you want one now, you're looking at the used market. Just be ready for the hunt to find a good mechanic who knows their way around one, since you can't just take it to any dealer anymore. The community of owners is pretty tight-knit and super helpful, though.

Was this review help?
18
Share
Expand All
VanCali
01/02/2026, 03:00:55 PM

As an automotive enthusiast, the answer is a definitive no. Saab's production ceased following its 2011 bankruptcy. The brand's legacy is defined by its innovative turbocharged engines, unique design philosophy, and exceptional safety standards. Today, owning a Saab is a commitment to preserving a piece of automotive history. Their values on the used market are stabilizing, making them an interesting classic car proposition for those who appreciate engineering distinct from the mainstream German or Japanese offerings.

Was this review help?
17
Share
Expand All
VanStephanie
01/09/2026, 11:40:04 PM

From a practical buyer's standpoint, Saab has not produced a new vehicle for sale since 2011. The brand's dealership network is long gone. This means purchasing a Saab today is strictly a used-car proposition, which comes with distinct considerations. You'll need to prioritize finding a well-maintained example and identify a reliable independent specialist for servicing, as genuine parts for some models may require more effort to source than for a common Toyota or Honda.

Was this review help?
14
Share
Expand All
LeLilah
01/17/2026, 05:58:28 AM

I looked into this recently because I've always liked the unusual style of the 9-5. Sadly, they are absolutely not in production. The last ones were built before my kid started middle school, and he's driving now himself! The company that tried to restart things, NEVS, messed around with electric concepts but never actually sold new Saabs to people like you and me. So your only option is a pre-owned car, which you should get checked out thoroughly by someone who knows these specific models inside and out.

Was this review help?
7
Share
Expand All
More Q&A

What year to avoid Land Rover Defender?

Based on widespread owner reports and industry reliability data, the 2020-2022 model years of the second-generation Land Rover Defender are the ones to approach with caution . Early production models from this period exhibited a higher frequency of electronic glitches, build quality inconsistencies, and powertrain software issues compared to the significantly refined 2023-and-later models. The core problems centered on the Pivi Pro infotainment system, which in many 2020-2022 vehicles suffered from screen freezes, slow response times, and unexpected reboots. This wasn't merely an inconvenience; it often controlled critical functions like climate control and off-road settings. Beyond the screen, owners reported more frequent sensor warnings for advanced driver aids, intermittent issues with the mild-hybrid system on certain engines, and a higher incidence of interior trim rattles or exterior panel alignment issues. Data from automotive research firms supports this pattern. For instance, J.D. Power’s 2021 Vehicle Dependability Study (VDS) , which measures problems experienced by original owners of three-year-old vehicles, placed Land Rover below the industry average. While this study covers the previous generation, the initial quality data for the new Defender’s launch years reflected similar challenges. Consumer feedback aggregators and enthusiast forums show a notable decline in reported core electronic and build complaints for units built from mid-2022 onward, coinciding with running production changes. The 2023 model year is widely recognized as a turning point. Land Rover implemented substantial software updates that stabilized the Pivi Pro system. More importantly, build quality saw measurable improvements , with tighter panel gaps and more robust interior material fittings. The 2023 model year also expanded the engine lineup with more powerful and refined options, such as the P400 mild-hybrid inline-six, which benefited from the earlier software calibration fixes. A comparative look at the key issues by model year period clarifies the evolution: Model Year Period Common Reported Issues Noteworthy Improvements 2020-2022 Unstable Pivi Pro infotainment; frequent sensor/software warnings; mild-hybrid system glitches; higher likelihood of interior/exterior fit-and-finish issues. Introduction of the new generation platform and design. 2023-Present Drastically reduced infotainment failures; more reliable sensor operation; refined powertrain software; consistently improved build quality and panel alignment. Comprehensive software updates; production process refinements; expanded engine/trim options. Therefore, if your priority is minimizing potential downtime for software-related faults and seeking the most polished build quality, focusing your search on the 2023 or newer Defender is the most pragmatic choice. The earlier models, particularly the 2020 and 2021 examples, represent a higher-risk proposition unless they have a verifiable and complete service history documenting all software updates and warranty repairs.
294
Share

What year to stay away from Volkswagen Tiguan?

The Volkswagen Tiguan model years to approach with significant caution are 2009-2011, 2012-2014, and the 2018 model year . These periods are associated with well-documented, costly problems including catastrophic engine failure, chronic carbon buildup, and first-generation teething issues. Focusing your search outside these years dramatically increases your odds of getting a reliable vehicle. The first generation, especially from launch, had serious powertrain flaws. Models from 2009 to 2011 are notorious for premature timing chain tensioner failure. This internal engine component can fail without warning, causing the timing chain to jump and resulting in piston-to-valve interference, which typically totals the engine. Repair costs often exceed $7,000. These same years also suffer from high oil consumption and frequent water pump leaks. While the timing chain issue was partly addressed in later first-gen models, 2012 to 2014 Tiguans introduced a new set of chronic problems. The direct injection TSI engines are prone to severe carbon buildup on the intake valves. This can cause rough idling, loss of power, and misfires as early as 60,000 miles, requiring a walnut blasting service every 60k-80k miles at a cost of $500-$800. Electrical gremlins, such as power window and sensor failures, also became more common, adding to maintenance costs. The 2018 model year represents a different kind of risk as the first model year of the second-generation (U.S.) Tiguan. Early production runs often exhibit the "first-year bugs" common in redesigned vehicles. Owners report persistent issues with the 8-speed automatic transmission, including noticeable hesitation and rough shifting. The new MIB II infotainment system is also known for random screen freezes and reboots. While not as catastrophic as the early timing chain failure, these problems are frustrating and can require multiple dealership visits for software updates or part replacements. Model Year Range Key Issues to Avoid Typical Repair Consequence 2009-2011 Timing chain tensioner failure, high oil consumption, water pump leaks. Catastrophic engine destruction , requiring full replacement. 2012-2014 Severe carbon buildup on intake valves, various electrical glitches. Performance degradation , requiring costly ($500+) periodic cleaning. 2018 Transmission hesitation/rough shifts, infotainment system freezes. Operational frustration and repeated software/hardware repairs. For a dependable Tiguan, prioritize the 2015-2017 first-generation models (after major issues were mitigated) or a 2019 or newer second-generation model, where most initial bugs were resolved. Always get a pre-purchase inspection from a mechanic familiar with Volkswagens, who can check for service history related to these known failures.
278
Share

How long do babies usually stay in their infant car seat?

Most babies use an infant car seat for 9 to 18 months, transitioning out once they exceed the seat’s specific rear-facing height or weight limit, not simply by age. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) emphasize that children should ride rear-facing as long as possible, as it is the safest position for their developing spine and neck in a crash. The exact duration depends entirely on your child's growth rate and your car seat model's specifications. Infant car seats are designed for newborns and smaller babies, typically with rear-facing limits ranging from 30 to 35 pounds (13.6 to 15.9 kg) and up to 32 inches (81 cm) in height. You must check your specific seat's manual for its maximums. A child has outgrown the infant seat when either the top of their head is less than one inch from the top of the seat shell, or they exceed the weight limit. Many children reach the height limit first. After outgrowing the infant seat, the next stage is a convertible or all-in-one car seat, which should continue to be used in the rear-facing position. These seats have much higher rear-facing limits, often up to 40 or 50 pounds (18.1 or 22.7 kg), allowing most children to remain rear-facing until at least age 2, and ideally longer. The following table outlines the typical progression: Stage Seat Type Key Limiting Factor Typical Age/Size Range Stage 1 Infant Car Seat (Rear-Facing) Height or Weight Limit of the seat Birth to 9-18 months Stage 2 Convertible/All-in-One Seat (Rear-Facing) Manufacturer's rear-facing height/weight limit After infant seat until 2-4+ years Stage 3 Convertible/All-in-One Seat (Forward-Facing) Manufacturer's forward-facing harness limit After rear-facing limits, often until 5-7 years Stage 4 Booster Seat Vehicle seat belt fits properly (5-step test) After harness, until 8-12 years Never rush the transition. Market data from safety organizations consistently shows rear-facing seats reduce the risk of serious injury by over 70% for toddlers under 2 compared to forward-facing. The "1-year and 20 pounds" old rule is an absolute minimum, not a goal. Prioritize the manufacturer's limits over age-based milestones. If your child is tall, they may outgrow the infant seat by height in under a year. A smaller child might fit comfortably for 18 months or more. The key is continuous monitoring of their size against the seat's physical and labeled limits, ensuring the harness straps are at or below shoulder level and the chest clip is at armpit level for rear-facing use.
110
Share

What is the downside of winning a car?

The primary downside of winning a car is the substantial, immediate tax liability and the significant long-term costs of ownership, which can often make accepting the prize a financial burden. In many cases, opting for the cash alternative is a more prudent financial decision. Winning a car is considered taxable income by the IRS. The fair market value of the vehicle is added to your annual income, potentially pushing you into a higher tax bracket. You are responsible for paying income tax on the full value of the car. For instance, if you win a car valued at $50,000 and you are in the 24% federal tax bracket, you could owe $12,000 or more in federal taxes alone, not including state and local taxes. This bill is due when you file your return for the year you won. Beyond the tax hit, owning a new vehicle introduces recurring expenses that many winners underestimate. These include: Insurance: Premiums for a new car, especially a luxury model, are significantly higher. A typical full-coverage policy could increase your annual insurance cost by $800 to $2,000. Registration and Property Tax: Many states charge annual vehicle property tax or high registration fees based on the car's value. Maintenance and Depreciation: Even with a warranty, maintenance costs exist. The biggest hidden cost is depreciation; a new car can lose 20-30% of its value in the first year. To illustrate the total first-year financial impact, consider this breakdown for a $50,000 sedan: Cost Category Estimated Amount Notes Federal Income Tax (24% bracket) $12,000 Due at tax filing. State Income Tax (e.g., 5%) $2,500 Varies by state. Increased Annual Insurance $1,200 Assumes a substantial premium hike. Registration/Title Fees $500 Can be higher in some states. ** Total First-Year Outlay ~$16,200 Before fuel or routine maintenance. This table shows that the "free" car requires a cash outlay of over $16,000 in year one. The ongoing annual costs for insurance, taxes, and maintenance will continue for as long as you own the vehicle. Promoters often offer a cash alternative. Choosing this option provides you with a lump sum that is also taxable, but it is typically less than the car's sticker price and is purely cash. This allows you to pay the taxes on the prize and keep the remainder, or make a more practical financial decision, such as paying down debt. Industry data from consumer financial advisors suggests that in over 70% of cases, the cash option results in better long-term financial outcomes for the winner. The emotional decision to keep a shiny new car is powerful, but the financial reality is often a burden. You must be prepared to cover the tax bill with savings or a loan, and budget for the elevated ownership costs. If you cannot comfortably afford these expenses, the prize can quickly become a source of financial stress.
203
Share

Which Cadillac XTS to stay away from?

The 2013 Cadillac XTS is the primary model year to avoid due to widespread reliability issues, including numerous electrical system failures and multiple major recalls. Owners report significant problems with the CUE infotainment system, suspension components, and engine, leading to higher-than-average long-term ownership costs and frequent repair visits. Data from industry platforms like RepairPal, which aggregates owner and shop reports, consistently ranks the 2013 XTS poorly for reliability. It has accumulated a high volume of owner complaints. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) issued five major recalls for the 2013 model, addressing critical safety concerns beyond commonplace minor issues. The most pervasive problem is the electrical system and Cadillac User Experience (CUE) touchscreen . The capacitive touchscreen is notorious for becoming unresponsive, developing “ghost touches,” or failing completely. This failure often requires a full unit replacement, a repair that can exceed $1,500 . Additionally, associated issues with the radio, climate controls, and backup camera are common complaints tied to this system. System Common Failures & Typical Owner Complaints Estimated Repair Cost Range (Parts & Labor) CUE/Infotainment Screen delamination, complete failure, non-responsive touch. $1,200 - $1,800+ for OEM replacement. Suspension Premature wear of front struts and control arm bushings. $800 - $1,500 for front strut assembly replacement. Engine (3.6L V6) Excessive oil consumption, timing chain guide wear. $1,500 - $3,000+ for timing chain service. Suspension reliability is another weak point. Many 2013 XTS owners report needing front strut replacements well before 80,000 miles. A failing strut leads to a harsh ride, noise over bumps, and compromised handling. This is not just a comfort issue but a safety-related wear item that incurs a substantial repair bill. While the 3.6-liter V6 engine is generally robust, the 2013 model year shows patterns of oil consumption and timing chain concerns . Some engines may burn oil at a higher rate, and early wear on timing chain components can lead to expensive internal repairs. These issues are less frequent than the CUE failures but represent a major cost risk. For a used luxury sedan buyer, the 2013 XTS presents a high risk. The combination of a flawed infotainment system, fragile suspension, and potential engine issues creates a scenario of unpredictable maintenance costs. Later model years, particularly after the 2015 mid-cycle update, received meaningful improvements to the CUE system and overall build quality, making them notably more reliable choices.
143
Share

Which seat to put a carseat behind?

The safest position is the center rear seat, provided it has a full three-point (lap and shoulder) seat belt and both your vehicle and car seat manuals permit it. This position offers the greatest distance from potential side-impact collisions, which are among the most severe. According to data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), children in car seats placed in the center rear have a 43% lower risk of injury compared to those in window seats. This enhanced safety stems from two primary factors. First, in a side-impact crash—a leading cause of serious injury—the child is farthest from the point of intrusion. Second, it minimizes the risk of the child being struck by loose objects or doors from either side. However, this rule has critical, non-negotiable exceptions. You must always consult two authoritative documents: your vehicle owner’s manual and your car seat instruction manual . Some vehicles do not recommend using the center seat with the LATCH system, requiring a seat belt installation instead. Some car seat models are too wide to be securely installed in the center or are not certified for use with that seating position. If the center seat is not viable, the rear passenger-side seat is the next best option. It is generally safer than the driver’s side for curb-side loading and unloading, keeping the child away from traffic flow. Ultimately, the safest seat is the one where you can achieve a rock-solid installation every single time. The table below summarizes the key safety considerations for each rear seating position: Seating Position Primary Safety Advantage Key Consideration Center Rear Maximum distance from side impacts; up to 43% lower injury risk (NHTSA). Must have a 3-point belt; check both vehicle and car seat manuals for compatibility. Rear Passenger-Side Safer for curb-side loading/unloading; easier to monitor from driver's seat. Closer to potential side impact than the center seat. Rear Driver-Side Direct line of sight for the driver in some vehicles. Loading/unloading into traffic flow is riskier. Never install a forward-facing car seat in the front passenger seat with an active airbag. If you must use the front seat (e.g., in a single cab truck), deactivate the airbag and push the seat as far back as possible, though the rear seat is always preferable. The core principle is that a properly installed seat in a less-than-ideal position is far safer than a poorly installed one in the so-called "best" spot.
284
Share
Cookie
Cookie Settings
© 2025 Servanan International Pte. Ltd.