Why do many people not recommend buying the VV6?

[Brad]

Previously, many people did not recommend buying the VV6 due to its relatively weak power. However, after the facelift, the power issue of the VV6 has been resolved. The upgraded WEY has shown significant improvement in its powertrain performance, making its acceleration capability quite competitive among its peers. Even the base model of the VV6 comes with sufficient features, offering great value for money. Therefore, the Great Wall VV6 is a model worth considering. Here are the relevant details: 1. Design: The VV6 did not focus on upgrading visible aspects this time, as WEY's overall design and configurations were already excellent and comprehensive at launch. This time, the VV6 mainly upgraded its powertrain and driver assistance systems, with no changes to its exterior. 2. Powertrain: Before the upgrade, the VV6, a 1.8-ton 'little fatty,' had only mediocre acceleration, far from being exciting. WEY reworked and recalibrated the VV6's previous engine, and as a result, this engine now delivers 227 horsepower and 387 Nm of torque, as if injected with adrenaline. The four bold exhaust pipes at the rear finally redeem some pride, with a 0-100 km/h acceleration time of 7.5 seconds, making the VV6 a nimble 'fatty.' 3. Driving Experience: The second impression that follows is its premium driving feel. Achieving this premium feel has only one condition: not pushing the engine too hard during driving. From 1 km/h to 100 km/h, whether on Jiangnan West Road or Nansha Port, tire noise, wind noise, and engine noise all seem irrelevant. However, this turbocharged engine can sometimes be a bit too vocal; during rapid acceleration, the scenario is like pouring a large bag of Pu'er tea leaves into hot water, filling the otherwise serene cabin with intense noise. Fortunately, the 'concentration' of this 'tea' is still much lower than most naturally aspirated + CVT Japanese SUVs. 3. Features: The upgraded VV6 has enhanced its driver assistance systems, adding emergency lane keeping to the lane-keeping system. When this function is activated, the vehicle automatically monitors the driving conditions of vehicles ahead and behind. If a collision is imminent and the driver does not react, the system will automatically correct the steering to avoid a collision. 4. Interior: The interior design of the VV6 remains unchanged, with materials and craftsmanship on the dashboard still ranking among the best in its class. The gear lever has a good grip but lacks a bit of refinement in its design. There's no need to worry too much about the VV6's space performance; among SUVs, the VV6 offers relatively spacious interiors. The overall longitudinal space in the cabin is slightly smaller than the CRV, but the headroom and lateral space are better than the CRV.

[DelBeau]

I have reservations about the WEY VV6, primarily due to its prominent fuel consumption issue. When driving it in the city, it easily consumes over 13 liters per 100 kilometers, and with the air conditioning on in summer, it's even more outrageous—spending hundreds more on fuel each month is not surprising. Plus, with its 2.0T engine, the performance isn't great, yet it guzzles fuel like water. Compared to similarly priced options like the Toyota RAV4 or the Haval H6 hybrid, it falls far behind in fuel efficiency. Parts aren't cheap either; replacing a small sensor can cost hundreds, and repair shops are few, often leaving you waiting half a day. While it boasts comprehensive safety features, minor malfunctions are frequent, like headlight sensor failures that affect nighttime visibility. In short, daily use brings high costs and plenty of hassles—better to opt for a more balanced vehicle.

[MackenzieFitz]

As a car enthusiast, I wouldn't recommend the VV6 due to its obvious technical shortcomings. While its interior design is flashy, the engine-transmission pairing is poor with frequent low-speed jerks and sluggish acceleration, making driving unenjoyable. The electronic systems are buggy – the infotainment screen often freezes or goes black, navigation lags intermittently, and it even affects the audio experience. At highway speeds, wind noise is pronounced, and the unstable chassis tuning causes body roll during lane changes. Brand reliability is mediocre, with owner forums complaining about numerous minor issues like door rattles and AC odors. These flaws significantly diminish driving pleasure. In contrast, models like the Honda CR-V or Geely Boyue offer much smoother powertrains and mature technology. Think twice before choosing the VV6 – unless you genuinely don't mind these imperfections.

[LeilaniLee]

I've experienced the downsides of the VV6 and regret buying it. The new car has high-end configurations and an attractive price, but its used car value is terrible—it depreciates by half in just three years, and no one wants to buy it. Reliability is a major flaw; it started leaking oil and had false sensor alarms before even reaching 20,000 km. Frequent repairs disrupted my commute. Compared to the Nissan Qashqai or Chery Tiggo 8, which hold their value better and have fewer issues, they're far more worry-free and cost-effective.

[VonLogan]

We've been using the VV6 for a while at home. The spacious interior is great for family trips, but the unreliable quality is frustrating. The plastic trim scratches easily, and it's hard to clean when kids make a mess in the back seats. The poor sound insulation leads to loud tire noise on highways, often waking the baby. The sluggish power response makes uphill driving difficult, and the ESP system sometimes intervenes too late on rainy days, creating dangerous situations. Minor issues like loose door handles require frequent maintenance, with high repair costs and time consumption. For a family car, stability and low maintenance are crucial. I'd rather switch to a GAC GS4 or Changan CS75PLUS.

[StAndres]

I believe the VV6 is not suitable for those on a tight budget or who frequently drive long distances. Its poor fuel economy with consumption over 13L makes highway driving even more expensive, increasing monthly expenses by two to three hundred yuan. The interior uses cheap materials with a strong unpleasant odor, making prolonged driving uncomfortable and potentially unhealthy. As a new brand, its after-sales service network is limited, making it difficult to find professional repair shops in second and third-tier cities, and parts often take a long time to arrive. Engine overheating issues frequently occur in summer, leading to power loss and jerky gear shifts. From an investment perspective, while it may be cheaper initially, it loses money in the long run compared to the BYD Song PLUS DM-i, which is more fuel-efficient, reliable, has longer maintenance intervals, and offers worry-free driving for ten years.