Why are there few buyers for the Audi SQ5?
3 Answers
SQ5 is a relatively niche model, which explains its low sales volume. More details are as follows: 1. Configuration: The new Audi SQ5 is equipped with a 10.1-inch touchscreen LCD display that responds quickly to commands, especially the satellite navigation and CarPlay mobile connectivity/mapping features, which are highly practical for accurate route planning and avoiding unnecessary detours. The 12.3-inch LCD instrument cluster offers excellent visual effects, providing intuitive feedback on various vehicle information to help drivers stay informed about the car's condition. 2. Dimensions: The new Audi SQ5 also offers ample space, with a body length of 4689mm and a wheelbase of 2825mm. The driver's seat provides an unrestricted view, and the middle position in the second row does not feel cramped. It also features sport-style leather seats that are not only comfortable to the touch but also excel in support, delivering an excellent driving and riding experience, even on long-distance journeys without causing fatigue.
I've driven several Audis and also test-drove the SQ5. This car indeed has impressive power, with its 3.0T V6 engine delivering quick acceleration and a thrilling driving experience. However, there are several reasons why few people buy it. The high price is the main factor, starting at over 600,000 yuan, significantly more expensive than the regular Q5, which is sufficient for daily driving. The suspension tuning is on the stiff side, making bumps over speed bumps quite noticeable, and it's not ideal for grocery runs or long trips. The fuel consumption is also high, exceeding 12 liters in the city, requiring frequent refueling and costing more. Maintenance and repairs are even pricier, with parts being hard to find. At the same price point, the BMW X3 M40i is a better choice, offering more balanced handling and greater practicality. Overall, the SQ5 has an awkward positioning and lacks cost-effectiveness.
I think buying a car requires careful calculation. The SQ5 is priced too high, and the performance improvement it offers isn't worth the extra cost—the regular Q5 is more cost-effective. Its fuel consumption is high, often reaching 11 to 13 liters in city driving, making refueling a hassle. Insurance costs are also significantly higher than those of average SUVs, making it an unwise choice for those on a tight budget. The space remains unchanged, offering mediocre practicality. Competitors like the Mercedes-Benz GLC AMG have similar prices but boast a cooler brand image. Fewer people choose it also because of the higher long-term costs. Nowadays, hybrid or electric vehicles are more popular—they’re hassle-free and economical.
