
SQ5 is a relatively niche model, which explains its low volume. More details are as follows: 1. Configuration: The new Audi SQ5 is equipped with a 10.1-inch touchscreen LCD display that responds quickly to commands, especially the satellite navigation and CarPlay mobile connectivity/mapping features, which are highly practical for accurate route planning and avoiding unnecessary detours. The 12.3-inch LCD instrument cluster offers excellent visual effects, providing intuitive feedback on various vehicle information to help drivers stay informed about the car's condition. 2. Dimensions: The new Audi SQ5 also offers ample space, with a body length of 4689mm and a wheelbase of 2825mm. The driver's seat provides an unrestricted view, and the middle position in the second row does not feel cramped. It also features sport-style leather seats that are not only comfortable to the touch but also excel in support, delivering an excellent driving and riding experience, even on long-distance journeys without causing fatigue.

I've driven several Audis and also test-drove the SQ5. This car indeed has impressive power, with its 3.0T V6 engine delivering quick acceleration and a thrilling driving experience. However, there are several reasons why few people buy it. The high price is the main factor, starting at over 600,000 yuan, significantly more expensive than the regular Q5, which is sufficient for daily driving. The suspension tuning is on the stiff side, making bumps over speed bumps quite noticeable, and it's not ideal for grocery runs or long trips. The fuel consumption is also high, exceeding 12 liters in the city, requiring frequent refueling and costing more. and repairs are even pricier, with parts being hard to find. At the same price point, the BMW X3 M40i is a better choice, offering more balanced handling and greater practicality. Overall, the SQ5 has an awkward positioning and lacks cost-effectiveness.

I think a car requires careful calculation. The SQ5 is priced too high, and the performance improvement it offers isn't worth the extra cost—the regular Q5 is more cost-effective. Its fuel consumption is high, often reaching 11 to 13 liters in city driving, making refueling a hassle. Insurance costs are also significantly higher than those of average SUVs, making it an unwise choice for those on a tight budget. The space remains unchanged, offering mediocre practicality. Competitors like the Mercedes-Benz GLC AMG have similar prices but boast a cooler brand image. Fewer people choose it also because of the higher long-term costs. Nowadays, hybrid or electric vehicles are more popular—they’re hassle-free and economical.

I have kids at home and have considered SUVs. The SQ5 looks sporty but is quite ordinary inside, with space basically the same as the Q5. Kids complain about the bumpy ride in the back seats. It has strong power, but the acceleration is too fast, making family members prone to motion sickness, which feels unsafe. The price is inflated, and paying an extra 200,000 yuan isn’t worth it. Daily fuel consumption is shocking—the fuel gauge drops quickly in city driving. The interior feels luxurious, but for family use, comfort and reliability matter more, making the Toyota Highlander more practical. Few people buy it because it’s too focused on performance and overlooks family needs.

From a technical perspective, the SQ5's engine delivers robust power, but its traditional turbocharging lacks the responsiveness of electric vehicles; the optional air suspension comes at a significant additional cost; the digital system updates slowly, with navigation or autonomous driving features lagging behind; is complex, with specialized and expensive parts; competitors like the Tesla Model Y Performance offer more innovative technology at a lower price. Overall, its appeal is limited in the fiercely competitive performance SUV market.

After comparing the sporty SUVs in the market, the SQ5 appears more understated than the BMW X3 M40i and Mercedes-Benz GLC 43 AMG, with a brand image that's less flamboyant. It's similarly priced but has weaker marketing, with fewer advertisements. While it offers high driving pleasure, its comfort is compromised. It has high fuel consumption and elevated long-term costs. The resale value depreciates quickly, not holding its value as well as the Porsche Macan. Fewer consumers choose it because they prefer the balanced advantages of its competitors.


