Which has higher fuel consumption, Haval H6 or Trumpchi GS4?

[RobertFitz]

Haval H6 has relatively higher fuel consumption. Here is the relevant information: 1. Haval H6: The 1.5T Haval H6 has a fuel consumption of approximately 8.2 liters, while the 2.0T Haval H6 consumes about 9.4 liters. The 1.5-liter turbocharged engine of the Haval H6 is equipped with CVVL technology and direct fuel injection, and it uses an aluminum alloy cylinder head and block. The 2.0-liter turbocharged engine features DVVT technology and direct fuel injection, with an aluminum alloy cylinder head and a cast iron cylinder block. 2. Trumpchi GS4: The manual transmission Trumpchi GS4 has a fuel consumption of about 7.5 liters, while the automatic version consumes approximately 8.1 liters. The new Trumpchi GS4 is equipped with a 1.5-liter turbocharged engine across all models, which offers better fuel efficiency and stronger power.

[IsaacFitz]

As a car enthusiast, I've driven the H6 and GS4 several times. The H6 typically consumes 9-10 liters per 100 kilometers in city driving and 6-7 liters on highways. In comparison, the GS4 is slightly lighter, averaging about 8-9 liters in urban areas and 5-6 liters on highways. This difference mainly stems from the vehicle weight, with the H6 being around 150 kg heavier, plus its engine tuning leans more towards power output. During daily traffic jams with frequent red lights, fuel consumption rises sharply. The GS4's throttle response is smoother and more fuel-efficient. However, both cars have good engines, and regular maintenance like oil and air filter changes can significantly improve fuel efficiency. I've tested that gentle driving with fewer sudden brakes can reduce combined fuel consumption by 10%. For saving money, the GS4 is the winner, but the H6 offers more spacious practicality, making the overall difference not that significant.

[OHolden]

I've been commuting daily with my GS4 for over a year now. The fuel consumption stays around 8 liters in city traffic jams, and I've achieved as low as 5.5 liters on highways. My friend drives an H6 and often complains about urban fuel consumption reaching 9-10 liters, with 6.5-7 liters on highways. We compared data, and under similar road conditions, the GS4 saves over 1 liter more, likely due to its lighter weight and quicker throttle response reducing fuel waste. The monthly fuel savings can buy a few cups of coffee—not a fortune, but it adds up. SUVs are inherently more fuel-consuming, so driving habits are crucial; less aggressive driving and more smooth acceleration lead to lower consumption. The GS4 has a slight edge in cost savings, though the H6 offers better comfort. The choice between them depends on daily needs.

[DiFelicity]

I've been recording fuel consumption for ten years as an old hand. Actual measurements show the H6 averages 9L/100km, while the GS4 is lower at 7.5-8L. On highways, the GS4 can reach 6L, and the H6 at least 6.5L. The main reason for the difference is the H6's heavier weight and engine tuning consuming more fuel, with a daily driving difference of about 1L. Maintenance costs are similar for both cars, but correct tire pressure with new tires can reduce consumption by 0.5L. Driving steadily saves fuel noticeably. Although the H6 consumes more, choosing the GS4 is more economical for saving on fuel costs.

[CharlesDella]

I've been studying car parameters. The data shows the H6 has a curb weight of 1700kg with combined fuel consumption of 9L, while the GS4 weighs about 1500kg with 8.2L consumption. The actual difference comes from weight and engine tuning - the H6 has stronger power but higher fuel consumption, with about 1.5L more in city driving. Smooth acceleration when driving can reduce fuel consumption by 10%, and maintaining clean air filters to prevent clogging is also important. The GS4 is more economical.