
On the evening of March 14th, on the Lianhuo Expressway from Henan to Shaanxi, a C200L experienced cruise control failure, passing through a toll station at a speed of 120km/h. The vehicle was eventually controlled by opening the car door to reduce speed. Relevant details are as follows: Failure: The owner is an amateur racer who tried various methods, including contacting Mercedes-Benz after-sales service, shifting gears, braking, using the electronic parking brake, and manually downshifting, all of which failed. The owner opened the car door, and the speed indeed decreased from 120km/h to about 60km/h. However, once the door was closed, the speed quickly returned to 120km/h. Speed reduction: The actual situation was that the owner unbuckled the seatbelt and opened the car door, which reduced the speed, deactivated the cruise control function, and then resolved the issue.

















I remember back in 2018, there was a viral story online about a C-Class owner who, after activating cruise control on the highway, suddenly found that the brakes wouldn't work and couldn't turn off the cruise control, forcing them to call the police and eventually stop with police escort. It really scared a lot of car owners at the time, and my friends who drove Mercedes were all discussing it. Later investigations revealed that the owner had fabricated the story, and the car's system wasn't faulty at all. Mercedes-Benz officials directly presented backend data to debunk the claim, and the police also found out that the owner was making up the story. This incident caused quite a stir and made people a bit paranoid about electronic systems. In reality, modern cars' electronic braking systems have mechanical backups, so if there's ever a problem, traditional brakes can still be used as a fallback.

As someone who frequently drives on highways, I was deeply impressed by the Mercedes cruise control incident. The owner claimed that the cruise control system was locked, causing the car to speed uncontrollably, but it was later proven to be completely fabricated. At the time, inspections found that the car's braking system was fully functional, and backend data showed that the owner had operated the brake and electronic gear lever. In fact, modern cruise control systems in cars have multiple safeguards—stepping on the brake takes priority to disengage cruise control, and power loss can also deactivate the system. That incident caused excessive panic among many people, but I still use cruise control on long trips as usual. The key is to understand that vehicle design already incorporates safety redundancy, and regular system and checks are essential.

That so-called brake failure incident was actually a misunderstanding. The owner claimed the Mercedes cruise control couldn't be disengaged, but police found the brake pedal sensor records were normal, and backend data proved the vehicle was decelerating. The party later admitted fabricating the emergency. From a technical perspective, modern vehicles' electronic systems have multiple safety mechanisms: for instance, brake override systems automatically disengage cruise control when the brake is pressed; all electronic systems fail when power is cut. That incident actually reminded us: it's crucial to understand emergency stop procedures, such as prolonged brake application or shifting to neutral, which can forcibly cut power.

I specifically looked up the information about that incident. In 2018, a car owner claimed that the cruise control malfunctioned and couldn't brake, but the manufacturer's backend data showed that the brake signal had been activated multiple times. It was eventually confirmed that the owner lied and deceived the police rescue. This incident reflects the public's misunderstanding of vehicle safety systems - key systems in modern cars have both mechanical and electronic safeguards. For example, the brake hydraulic pipe is directly connected to the wheels, allowing braking even if electronic control fails. Cruise control can also be easily deactivated: lightly pressing the brake, pressing the cancel button, or even shifting to neutral gear will do the trick. After that farce, car manufacturers actually strengthened the safety instructions in user manuals.

When the incident first emerged, I followed the entire investigation process closely. The focus was on whether the cruise control could truly lock the brakes, and in the end, Mercedes computer data to prove the owner was lying. Interestingly, this incident ended up educating the public about automotive safety design: electronic cruise systems must yield to physical inputs. The braking mechanism itself doesn’t rely on electronic controls, and the mechanical linkage of the steering column ensures direct wheel control. Later, I tested it in my own car—holding the brake for three seconds always disengages cruise, and shifting to neutral instantly cuts power. This design exists precisely to prevent electronic failures, and that farce taught many people emergency protocols.


