What is the fuel consumption of the Santana Classic?
3 Answers
The average actual fuel consumption of the Santana Classic is 6.1L. Below is an extended introduction: 1. Powertrain Overview: The Santana is equipped with a 1.5L naturally aspirated engine, delivering a maximum power output of 81kW and a peak torque of 150Nm. Many buyers choose this model for its fuel efficiency, which stands out favorably compared to other vehicles in its class. 2. Brand Background: Introduced in 1973, the Santana has evolved over 30 years and has become a ubiquitous presence across China. Key models include the Santana 87 (Classic Santana, discontinued), Santana 2000 (discontinued, latest model year 2002), Santana 3000 (discontinued, latest model year 2005), Santana Vista Zhijun (latest model year 2014), and the All-New Santana (latest model year 2015). 3. Exterior Design: The redesigned Santana features significant exterior updates, adopting Volkswagen's family-style front fascia that blends with other compact models in the lineup. The new grille incorporates chrome horizontal bars, giving it a more upscale appearance reminiscent of the Passat. However, the lack of additional chrome trim leaves the front design somewhat plain and lacking in visual depth.
My old Santana 2000 has been running for almost 20 years. It's a 1.8L manual transmission model, and in city driving during summer with AC on, it typically consumes 10-11 liters per 100km, while on highways it can drop to around 7 liters. These old carburetor-equipped cars are indeed more fuel-thirsty compared to modern vehicles, especially in traffic jams with frequent stops at traffic lights - you can literally watch the fuel gauge drop when accelerating slightly harder. Regular throttle body cleaning and spark plug replacement are crucial. Once I skipped maintenance for two months and the fuel consumption suddenly jumped to 13 liters - the mechanic said the carburetor carbon buildup was too severe. Converting to natural gas could save about one-third of fuel costs, but the power output would become noticeably weaker.
A couple of days ago, I was flipping through my dad's old maintenance manual and found the instruction booklet for the Santana he bought in the 1990s. It stated that the 1.8L model had a combined fuel consumption of 8.5L/100km. However, actual driving conditions greatly affected fuel efficiency. He mentioned that his daily 20km commute to work on suburban roads without traffic lights could achieve 7.8L/100km, but in-city traffic jams would push it above 10L. Looking back, modern cars are much more fuel-efficient. Back then, carburetor engines required using the choke for cold starts, and winter fuel consumption was even higher. Worn clutch plates in older cars also increased fuel usage. After a major service at 150,000 km, his fuel consumption actually dropped by 0.6L.
