What is the difference between front and rear brakes?
2 Answers
Front and rear brakes differ in terms of stopping speed and safety. Below are the differences between front and rear brakes: 1. Stopping speed: When braking while driving, the rear wheels cannot provide enough friction to stop the car quickly, whereas the front wheels can use the front brake to convert the car's forward inertia into a downward force. This allows the front wheels to gain more friction than the rear wheels, resulting in a quicker stop. 2. Safety: Rear brakes can cause the rear wheels to lock up and skid, whereas the front wheels are less likely to skid unless excessive force is applied, making them relatively safer.
On the racetrack, I always deeply feel the significant difference between front and rear brakes. The front brakes act like the main force, bearing about 70% of the braking load, especially during emergency stops when the vehicle's weight shifts forward, putting tremendous pressure on the front wheels. That's why modern cars often use ventilated disc brake designs to enhance heat dissipation and aid rapid deceleration. The rear brakes are more responsible for stability, preventing rear-wheel skidding and loss of control—like an assistant helping maintain balance during corners. My experience is that relying too much on the rear brakes during high-speed driving can induce the risk of fishtailing, while on slippery roads, front-brake dominance can shorten braking distances. Regular maintenance is crucial—front brake pads may need replacement every 20,000 to 30,000 kilometers due to faster wear; rear brakes, like drum systems, are more durable but prone to rust. ABS technology cleverly coordinates the pressure distribution between the two, preventing lock-up issues. By understanding these differences, both my driving safety and performance have improved.
