What are the shortcomings of the Changan CS75 Plus?

[DelAbel]

Comparison between Honda XRV and Kamic GT: 1. Dimensions: The Honda XRV has a length, width, and height of 4328mm, 1772mm, and 1610mm respectively; the Kamic GT measures 4409mm in length, 1781mm in width, and 1606mm in height. 2. Transmission: The Honda XRV is equipped with a CVT continuously variable transmission; the Kamic GT comes with a 6-speed automatic manual transmission. 3. Engine: The Honda XRV is powered by a 1.5L naturally aspirated engine with a maximum power of 96kW and peak torque of 155Nm; the Kamic GT is equipped with a 1.5L naturally aspirated engine delivering a maximum power of 82kW and peak torque of 145Nm.

[NorahAnn]

I've been driving my newly purchased Changan CS75 PLUS for almost a year now. While it's generally practical, there are quite a few drawbacks. The fuel consumption in congested urban areas can reach 11 liters per 100 kilometers, which is higher than I expected, making every refueling session painful for my wallet. The noise insulation is barely satisfactory, with noticeable wind and road noise on highways, forcing us to raise our voices during conversations, which is quite annoying. The suspension tuning is on the stiff side, resulting in a bumpy ride over speed bumps or uneven roads, and my kids in the back seat have complained about discomfort several times during family outings. The steering wheel feels heavy at low speeds, making long city drives tiring for the arms. The interior looks well-designed but the materials feel plasticky, appearing cheap under sunlight, and the seat support isn't quite adequate. The infotainment system is slow to boot up and occasionally lags, and the outdated navigation has led me astray twice—these small details affect daily usability. The brake response isn't sharp enough, causing some anxiety in emergency situations. Overall, it offers ample space and plenty of features suitable for family use, but refinement needs improvement.

[DiAdriel]

As a car enthusiast who often researches vehicles, I find the CS75 PLUS has some technical shortcomings. The 1.5T engine exhibits uneven torque output in the low RPM range, resulting in noticeable jerking during starts or hill climbs, with significant power response delays. The suspension system is tuned for a sportier feel, which compromises ride comfort as it doesn't absorb road bumps smoothly, especially causing back fatigue after long-distance driving. Electronic systems like the ESC (Electronic Stability Control) sometimes react with delays, making the car prone to skidding during high-speed turns in rainy conditions. Tire noise becomes more pronounced at high tire pressures, and switching to quieter tires is recommended for improvement. The body sealing is average, with noticeable gaps around doors affecting sound insulation. The paint is thin and easily scratched, with minor parking scrapes often revealing the primer. Battery life is shorter than expected, requiring earlier inspections and replacements. Overall, its performance and reliability aren't top-tier among similarly priced models, and hardware upgrades might enhance the experience.

[Vieira]

I bought this car for its low price but overlooked the economic costs. The average fuel consumption for city commuting is 10 liters per 100 kilometers, significantly higher than competitors like the Haval H6, costing an extra 300-400 yuan per month on fuel. The maintenance cycle is short, requiring service every six months, with each visit costing 500-600 yuan, nearly 50% more than joint-venture brands. The resale value is poor, depreciating by more than half in three years, making it hard to fetch a good price. Insurance costs are also high due to expensive repair parts—a minor collision to fix a light can cost over a thousand yuan. Tires wear out quickly, needing replacement at 20,000 kilometers. Fuel efficiency is subpar, worsening in winter. If you're on a tight budget and concerned about long-term expenses, this might not be the best choice. It's recommended to calculate the total cost of ownership before purchasing to avoid regrets.

[GageFitz]

I tested the intelligent features of the CS75 PLUS. The system design is trendy but lacks stability. The infotainment system often freezes for three seconds before responding, and the touchscreen has noticeable lag, making operations frustrating. The navigation data updates slowly and is outdated, leading me to take detours and miss several important appointments. The voice assistant has low recognition accuracy, only working with standard Mandarin, and sometimes fails completely. Driving assistance features like lane-keeping occasionally malfunction, causing dangerous deviations on highways. The multimedia system has poor compatibility, and Bluetooth connections are unstable. The USB port placement is inconvenient for charging. The large screen suffers from severe glare, making it hard to see in sunlight. The automatic air conditioning's fan control is unresponsive, causing inconsistent temperatures. Overall, it offers a high-tech feel but lacks practicality and reliability, requiring software optimization.

[WalterLee]

After two years of driving the CS75 PLUS, several long-term minor issues have emerged. The air conditioning compressor makes abnormal noises, with an annoying squeaking sound when cooling in summer. The brake discs have worn excessively, requiring two replacements at high costs. The gaps in the interior panels have widened, causing creaking noises on bumpy roads, affecting comfort. The electronic system occasionally malfunctions, with issues like automatic headlight switching failure, leading to frequent repairs. The suspension components show poor durability, with signs of softening shock absorbers. The original tires' treads have worn out quickly, necessitating early replacement. The brand's after-sales service is inefficient, with long appointment queues and extended waiting times. The car paint fades rapidly, losing half its gloss within two years. Overall reliability falls short of competing joint-venture models in the same class, requiring frequent visits to the service center for even minor issues. Regular comprehensive maintenance is recommended to prevent problems and extend the vehicle's lifespan.