
The differences between the Tayron 330 and 380 lie in their engines: The Tayron 330 model is equipped with a low-power version of the 2.0-liter turbocharged engine, delivering 186 horsepower and a maximum torque of 320 Nm; The Tayron 380 model uses a high-power version of the 2.0-liter turbocharged engine, producing 220 horsepower and a maximum torque of 350 Nm. The low-power engine in the Tayron 330 features hybrid injection technology and utilizes an aluminum cylinder head with an iron cylinder block. The high-power engine in the Tayron 380 employs direct fuel injection technology, also with an aluminum cylinder head and iron cylinder block, achieving a maximum power of 162 kW and a maximum torque of 350 Nm. It is paired with Volkswagen's DQ500 7-speed wet dual-clutch transmission.

The main differences between the Tayron 330 and 380 lie in power and fuel consumption. The 330 is a low-power version of the 2.0T engine, delivering approximately 186 horsepower, which is sufficient for city driving with smooth acceleration. The 380 is a high-power version with around 220 horsepower, offering stronger performance and a more noticeable push-back sensation, but its average fuel consumption is about 1L higher. From my daily usage experience, the 330 is more fuel-efficient and cost-effective, averaging 7.5L/100km, making it ideal for commuters. The 380 excels in power, showing clear advantages when climbing hills or overtaking on highways. Price-wise, the 330 is more affordable, with a starting price 20,000-30,000 RMB lower, while the 380 comes with slightly higher configurations, such as standard all-wheel drive. However, if you don’t frequently drive on mountain roads or highways, I don’t think it’s necessary to spend the extra money. Maintenance costs are similar for both, but the 380 may incur slightly higher fuel and insurance expenses. Overall, the choice depends on personal driving habits: opt for the 330 if you prioritize economy, or the 380 if you value power.

The key difference between the 330 and 380 lies in engine performance. The 330's 2.0T engine delivers 186 horsepower and 320 Nm of torque, achieving 0-100 km/h acceleration in approximately 8.5 seconds. The 380, on the other hand, boasts 220 horsepower and 350 Nm of torque, with acceleration under 7 seconds, making it more responsive to drive. In terms of fuel consumption, the 380 is slightly higher by about 1L/100km, averaging 8L in city driving compared to the 330's 7L. Regarding drivetrain, the 380 typically comes with all-wheel drive, offering more stable handling, especially in rain or snow, while the 330 mostly features front-wheel drive, making it more agile in turns. There's not much difference in configurations, though the 380 may include more advanced features like adaptive cruise control. However, the 330 is sufficient for daily use. I'm fascinated by these specifications—the data suggests the 380 is better suited for those seeking driving pleasure, but the higher fuel consumption means higher long-term costs, making the 330 more economical. For city driving, the 330's power is adequate, while the 380 shows its advantages on slopes or highways. The 380 is about 20,000 yuan more expensive, so choosing between them requires balancing personal needs and budget.

Fuel efficiency is the key difference. The 330 is more fuel-efficient than the 380, averaging 7L/100km in the city, while the 380 is close to 8L. Over time, this can save a significant amount on fuel costs. In terms of power, the 330 performs well and is sufficient for daily commuting. The 380 accelerates faster but consumes more fuel, with stronger acceleration leading to higher fuel consumption. The 330 is more affordable, while the 380 is slightly more expensive. The configurations are similar, but the 380 may come with four-wheel drive, which increases fuel consumption. I think the 330 is suitable for those who are budget-conscious and works perfectly for city use, while the 380 is for those who don't mind spending more on fuel and prefer powerful performance. Both models have similar space and resale value, but fuel consumption affects environmental friendliness. Choosing the 330 is more economical and eco-friendly.

The driving experience differs significantly. The 330 feels smooth with adequate power for daily use, while the 380 offers quicker engine response, aggressive acceleration, and more confidence during high-speed overtaking. This stems from their engine power differences—the 380 boasts higher horsepower and torque, delivering clear superiority when climbing hills. Fuel consumption is slightly higher for the 380 (about 1L more in city driving), but the extra cost is worth it for the driving thrill. Both handle stably, but the 380 comes standard with AWD, ensuring safer and smoother performance in rain or on mountain roads. For power enthusiasts, the 380 is the right choice with its exhilarating acceleration, while the 330’s smoothness suits commuting beginners. Space is identical, but the 380 delivers a more spirited drive.


