What are the differences between the new G-Class and the old G-Class?

[DiAllison]

The differences between the new G-Class and the old G-Class: 1. Different wheelbase: The new G-Class has a wheelbase of 2850mm; the old G-Class has a wheelbase of 2890mm. 2. Different appearance: The new G-Class features circular headlights with multi-beam LED light sources, and the LED ring-shaped daytime running lights are integrated into them. The front grille adopts a three-slat chrome design with hollowed-out styling and curved elements; the old G-Class lacks the hollowed-out styling and curved elements. If you want to distinguish between the old and new models from the side of the car, the rearview mirrors are the key. The new-generation Mercedes-Benz G-Class adopts a more rounded rearview mirror design, combined with softly contoured LED turn signals, making the exterior of the new G-Class appear more rounded.

[MalachiLynn]

I'm the kind of person who obsesses over mechanical details of cars all day long. The differences between the new G-Class and the old one are quite significant. I think the most obvious changes are in the technology and engine upgrades. The new model features a more advanced four-cylinder turbo and hybrid system, offering quicker starts and more responsive power delivery, thanks to Mercedes-Benz's optimized electronic control system that reduces sluggishness. The old model still uses a traditional V6, which feels a bit heavy when driving. In terms of exterior, the new model retains the classic boxy design but with more refined LED headlights and air intakes, as if adding fashionable accessories. The interior has undergone a major overhaul, now equipped with dual 12.3-inch screens and the MBUX voice assistant, making navigation much easier while driving. The old model's interior feels rigid, with outdated buttons. As for off-roading, the new model's suspension is tuned to be smoother, reducing vibrations on bumpy roads, improving comfort but slightly slowing down handling response. Safety has also improved, with added ADAS systems like active braking and lane keeping, which the old model lacks. I've noticed that if you're after pure mechanical driving, the old model actually feels more direct, with simpler maintenance and cheaper parts. Overall, the new model suits those who prioritize technology and comfort, while the old one is better for fans who prefer retro toughness.

[ValeriaMarie]

As an average car owner who drives daily and has been driving for ten years, the differences between the old and new G-Class are more pronounced in terms of practicality and comfort. The new model's interior is incredibly comfortable, feeling like a sofa when you sit in it, and the noise control is excellent, with significantly less wind noise, making long drives less tiring. The old model had harder seats and noticeable wind noise at high speeds, requiring earplugs for long trips. Space hasn't changed much, with the rear seats still being spacious. However, there's a big difference in fuel consumption—the new hybrid model is much more fuel-efficient in the city, using half as much fuel as the old model, thanks to its lightweight engine design. Externally, the new model has added some curves but maintains its rugged overall style, with bright LED lights for safer nighttime driving. The old model's lights were dimmer, making it harder to see when parked at night. In terms of features, the new model has push-button start and automatic climate control, making it easier for elderly and children to use, while the old model required manually turning the key. I've also noticed that maintenance for the new model is more expensive, with more electronic glitches, while the old model was simpler and more durable but had less efficient air conditioning. Overall, the new model is a great modern commuting companion, while the old model suits drivers like me who prefer a more rugged driving experience.

[DelAdriana]

I'm an off-road enthusiast who spends years tackling wild mountain trails, and there are subtle differences in off-road capabilities between the new and old G-Class. The new model has upgraded its suspension system, with adjustable air suspension that allows for higher ground clearance, slightly better mud traction, and more stable cornering. However, the increased electronic intervention makes it less raw for extreme off-roading. The old model features purely mechanical differential locks, allowing it to plow through rough terrain with direct and reliable feedback. Ground clearance is similar, but the new model has improved underbody protection, reducing scrapes on rocky paths. While the exterior hasn't changed much, the new model's front grille enhances airflow for better cooling, preventing heat fade in desert conditions. The old model's interior is simpler and easier to repair, whereas the new one adds touchscreens that occasionally malfunction—a hassle in remote areas with poor signal. Fuel-wise, the old model guzzles gas like a beast, while the new one is slightly more efficient but heavier, consuming more energy on complex terrain. I prefer the old model's durability—it's like a dependable old friend with fewer electronic failures.

[VanDaniel]

As someone who values aesthetics, the design differences between the old and new G-Class caught my eye. The new model retains the classic boxy silhouette but incorporates modern elements, with sleeker LED headlights and a more integrated taillight design for enhanced visual flow. The old version features rugged straight lines and simple retro halogen lighting. The interior has undergone a dramatic transformation—the new model adopts the Mercedes family-style layout with a dual-screen dashboard for a tech-savvy feel and cozy ambient lighting, while the old version relied on hard plastic panels that appear dated. In terms of details, the new alloy wheels exude a sportier and more imposing vibe, whereas the old solid steel wheels were bulky but durable. The new model's slightly adjusted proportions improve overall harmony, reducing drag by 0.1 for quieter highway performance. Color options are more diverse in the new version, including matte paint choices, while the old one offered only a few glossy shades. Material upgrades in the new model, such as genuine leather upholstery, enhance comfort, unlike the old version's faux leather prone to wear. I admire this blend of heritage and innovation—preserving its off-road soul while adding urban refinement.

[JoannaLee]

From a cost-conscious perspective, the new G-Class comes with a significantly higher price tag, with the base model costing hundreds of thousands more than the old version, mainly due to the addition of numerous electronic features. Daily maintenance costs are also higher, with expensive replacements for new systems like ADAS components and insurance premiums increasing by several hundred per month. In contrast, parts for the older model are widely available, making repairs cheaper. Reliability-wise, the new version has slightly more issues, such as sensors prone to malfunction affecting driving, while the old model's mechanical robustness means fewer minor faults. Fuel-wise, the older version consumes more, with monthly fuel expenses exceeding those of the new hybrid model, but it saves money in the long run. In the used car market, the old model's classic design gives it greater appreciation potential, making it a better investment; the new version depreciates faster but offers trendy and comfortable experiences. Feature-wise, the new version adds perks like automatic parking, while the old one is simple yet sufficient. I believe if you're on a tight budget, the old model is the wiser choice; if money isn't an issue, the new version is worth the price for the enjoyment it brings.