What are the differences between the Crown 155 and 133?

[VanSamuel]

The differences between the Crown 155 and 133: 1. In terms of exterior design, the most significant difference is that the 155 has a more angular and rugged appearance, while the 133 is more rounded. The 133 features integrated taillights, whereas the 155's taillights consist of separate turn signals and trunk lid lights. 2. The ninth-generation Crown introduced a completely new exterior design, abandoning the previous "boxy" style in favor of a more "rounded" aesthetic, giving the car a more modern look. The ninth-generation Crown is part of the 13X series in the Crown lineup, with the JZS133 model being the most common in China, commonly referred to as the 133. Additional Information: The Crown is a mid-to-large-sized car brand under the Toyota Group. The Toyota Crown was first launched in Japan on January 1, 1955, and has since progressed through more than 13 generations. The domestic Crown models are equipped with 2.5L, 3.0L, and 4.3L engines. The first two are V6-cylinder, 24-valve designs, while the 4.3L engine is a V8. The engines feature the Dual-VVT-i (Dual Variable Valve Timing-intelligent) system, which significantly improves intake efficiency, fuel economy, and power performance, delivering stronger horsepower.

[Jill]

I've driven quite a few old Crown models, and the differences between the 155 and 133 are quite noticeable. The 133 has a more boxy body, typical of 1980s design, and drives like a boat with a lot of swaying and significant body roll in corners. The 155, on the other hand, is much smoother, with rounded lines and lower drag coefficient, making it more stable at high speeds. In terms of engines, the 133 uses the older 7M engine with average power, while the 155 is equipped with the new 2JZ series, featuring a 3.0L displacement that offers much quicker throttle response and about 10% lower fuel consumption. The 155 also comes with additional features like a driver-side airbag and ABS, which were cutting-edge tech back then, along with improved audio quality. The 155's chassis and suspension are tuned for a sportier feel, making it less bumpy over speed bumps, though the 133's seats are softer. Classic car enthusiasts often prefer the 133 for its iconic style, but the 155 is more practical for daily driving.

[OKaleb]

In the used car market, it's common to see these two models, and there's a good reason why the Crown 155 is about 20,000 yuan more expensive than the 133. The interior plastic parts of the 133 tend to crack, while the 155 uses thicker and softer materials. The dashboard of the 155 features a digital LCD display, whereas the 133 still has traditional analog gauges. The most critical difference is the engine: the 7M engine in the 133 commonly burns oil and is troublesome to repair, while the 2JZ engine in the 155 is exceptionally durable, capable of running 200,000 kilometers without a major overhaul. The 155 also upgraded to a fully automatic air conditioning system, which cools faster and operates more quietly. The tire specifications of the 155 are wider, significantly improving grip. When buying used, the 133 is cheaper but has higher maintenance costs, while the 155 holds its value better. As for drawbacks, the headlight design of the 155 is prone to moisture buildup, a problem the 133 doesn't have.

[VanGabrielle]

Modification enthusiasts highly value the 2JZ-GE engine in the 155, which produces 220 horsepower stock and can easily exceed 300 horsepower with an ECU tune. In contrast, the 7M engine in the 133 has significantly less modification potential. The 155 features a multi-link rear suspension, making it more suitable for a lowered stance, while the 133 still uses a torsion beam setup. Exterior-wise, the 155 comes with a subtle wide-body effect, requiring only a set of wheels to enhance its look, whereas the 133 needs spacers for a similar effect. The 155 also has a 5-liter larger fuel tank, offering longer range. For drifting, the 155's power steering is more linear, while the 133 feels heavier. However, 133 parts are cheaper—body kits can be bought for just a few hundred, whereas 155 aftermarket parts cost two to three times more. That said, the 133 has higher ground clearance, making it better suited for rough roads.

[Corey]

Simply put, it's a generational upgrade: The Crown 133 is considered the ninth generation (1987-1991), while the 155 is the tenth generation (1991-1995). In terms of dimensions, the 155 is 40mm longer and wider than the 133, with a wheelbase extended by 60mm, providing significantly more rear passenger space. The 133 was equipped with the 7M series engine, while the 155 upgraded to the all-new 2JZ, maintaining the same 3.0L displacement but increasing power from 190 to 220 horsepower. The transmission in the 155 was upgraded to the smoother ECT-i system. In terms of safety, the 155 was the first to feature front dual airbags and ABS, along with an added LCD display on the instrument panel. The headlights on the 155 changed from square to round, and the taillight design became more modern. Fuel consumption in urban areas was about 12L for the 155, compared to around 14L for the 133. The 155 also added a pollen filter to the air conditioning system, making it more friendly to those with allergies.

[MaverickLynn]

During car repairs, significant differences were found between the 155 and 133 chassis structures: The 155 switched to an entirely new platform with redesigned front and rear suspensions, and the lower control arms now use lighter aluminum alloy material. The 133's brake calipers are single-piston, while the 155 upgraded to dual-piston. The steering system in the 155 changed from recirculating-ball to rack-and-pinion, offering much more precise steering. The engine bay layout in the 155 is more rational, allowing spark plug replacement without removing the intake manifold. The 155's electrical system introduced CAN-BUS bus technology for the first time, significantly reducing circuit failure rates. However, the 155's water pump has a design flaw that inevitably leads to leaks by 100,000 km, unlike the 133 which rarely experiences this issue. The 155's transmission oil pan is made of plastic, making it prone to cracking if the undercarriage is impacted, whereas the 133's metal pan is more durable. Maintenance costs for the 155 are on average 30% higher, but its failure rate is substantially lower.