
Differences lie in their distinct market positioning. Below are the key comparisons: Technology: The Plus adopts the Super Hybrid DMi technology, emphasizing fuel efficiency, while the Pro utilizes DMp technology, prioritizing acceleration performance at the cost of higher fuel consumption. Engine: The Qin PRO is equipped with a BYD476ZQB engine, featuring a 1.5T displacement, whereas the Qin PLUS employs the Xiaoyun engine with a 1.5L displacement. Pros and Cons of the Pro: Advantages: Striking aesthetics, particularly its distinctive front fascia design, spacious interior, robust power delivery with noticeable acceleration thrust, smooth ride quality, and well-cushioned, supportive seats. Disadvantages: Higher fuel consumption, plastic materials used in the center console gear shift area, and relatively low ground clearance requiring caution when traversing uneven roads.

















I previously compared the Qin Pro and Qin Plus, with the main differences lying in the powertrain. The Qin Pro is an older plug-in hybrid model, slightly less powerful, with a pure electric range of only about 80 kilometers and slower charging—it takes half a day to fully charge. The Qin Plus uses BYD's new DM-i technology, offering a pure electric range of up to 120 kilometers and a combined range of over 1,200 kilometers when fully fueled. It charges faster, with fast charging allowing you to drive dozens of kilometers in just half an hour. Overall, the acceleration is smoother, and the engine noise is quieter, making it feel more like a pure electric car. The Qin Plus also features an upgraded pack with a longer lifespan and better performance in cold weather, reducing the likelihood of power loss. If you prioritize efficiency and a quiet driving experience, the Qin Plus is clearly the better choice, especially for city commuting—it’s fuel-efficient, hassle-free, and worry-free even on long trips.

As an ordinary person who has driven both models, I feel the Qin Plus excels in exterior design and space. The Qin Pro has a more traditional design with rounded lines, a plastic-heavy interior, slightly cramped rear seating for three, and noticeable high-speed noise. The Qin Plus looks more stylish with a distinctive front fascia, uses soft-touch materials for a better feel, has a widened rear seat that even fits child seats comfortably, and shows significant improvements in noise reduction—wind and road noise are much lower, making high-speed driving quieter. The space layout is also more practical, with a deeper trunk for more storage. Overall, the Qin Plus is better suited for family use, comfortable for commuting, school runs, and shopping, while the Qin Pro feels like its older version—functional but less refined.

From a cost-saving perspective, there's quite a difference between the Qin Pro and Qin Plus. The Qin Pro starts at 150,000 yuan with higher fuel consumption—around 5 liters in urban areas—and requires more frequent with expensive parts replacement. The Qin Plus, starting at 130,000 yuan, offers upgraded features at a lower price. Its DM-i system is extremely fuel-efficient, achieving about 4 liters in city driving. The plug-in hybrid mode can save thousands in fuel costs annually. Insurance and maintenance are also cheaper, and with a longer battery warranty, it's much more worry-free. In the long run, the Qin Plus offers better value for money, with savings substantial enough to supplement household expenses.

As an average car owner, the differences between the Qin Pro and Qin Plus in daily use are quite noticeable. The Qin Pro is suitable for short commutes, but its power output is uneven at high speeds, with noticeable jerks during acceleration, and the steering wheel is on the heavier side, making it tiring to drive for long periods. The Qin Plus offers quicker power response, smoother stop-and-go performance in city traffic, and a lighter steering wheel, making it more suitable for beginners or female drivers. In terms of family use, the Qin Pro has a smaller trunk, making it cramped for luggage, while the Qin Plus is designed with expandable space, making it convenient for strollers or suitcases. Regarding charging, the Qin Plus supports fast charging, replenishing a significant amount of power in half an hour, whereas the Qin Pro's slow charging is time-consuming. For weekend trips, the Qin Plus is the more worry-free choice.

When it comes to safety and technology, the difference between the Qin Pro and Qin Plus is quite significant. The Qin Pro offers basic safety features like ABS and airbags, but its driver assistance systems are simple, with a blurry rearview camera. The Qin Plus adds ADAS functions such as adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist, which can automatically follow vehicles on highways, reducing driver fatigue, and its night-vision camera is clearer. safety has also been upgraded, with the Qin Plus using blade battery technology that better resists thermal runaway risks, providing enhanced protection. The body structure has been reinforced, resulting in higher crash test scores. In terms of technology, the Qin Plus has a larger central control screen, faster voice control response, and more accurate navigation. Driving it offers greater peace of mind, especially in rainy or snowy conditions.


