What are the differences between Baojun 100 and 200?

[BethanyDella]

Baojun 100 and 200 differ in terms of comfort level. Riding Comfort: The Baojun E200 has improved seat wrapping, providing better lumbar support, and comes standard with 4-way seat adjustment across all models. According to user habits, the Baojun E200 also features a carefully designed interior storage space, including door armrests, dedicated hooks and card slots, and a hidden compartment in the front passenger seat, totaling 11 storage spaces to meet various storage needs. The foldable front passenger seat also provides ample space for larger items. The Baojun 100 lacks these features. Driving Comfort: In terms of driving experience, the Baojun E200 combines the motor and reducer into a single unit, creating the world's first mass-produced integrated electric axle. This significantly reduces transmission noise and motor vibration, enhancing driving comfort.

[VonSamuel]

The differences between the Baojun 100 and 200 are quite significant. The 100 is a two-seater microcar, while the 200 has been upgraded to a four-seater, so it can accommodate rear passengers, though the legroom is a bit tight. In terms of size, the 200 is considerably longer, measuring about 3.7 meters, which is over half a meter longer than the 100. The 100 has a claimed range of 120 km, but with air conditioning on, it might only manage 80-90 km. The 200 uses a larger battery capacity, with an official range of 200 km, but in reality, it can achieve around 160 km. The motor power of the 200 is also slightly higher than the 100, making it more powerful to drive. Both models require about 7 hours to charge, and neither has a fast-charging port. Price-wise, the 100 sells for over 30,000 yuan, while the 200 is about 10,000 yuan more expensive but comes with additional features like a rearview camera. For family use, the 200 is more practical, but if it's just for commuting alone, the 100 is easier to park.

[DelBennett]

These two cars are positioned differently. The Baojun 100 is more like a pure commuting tool, with its two-seat design offering super flexibility—ideal for navigating narrow alleys and finding parking spots with ease. However, its short range limits it to urban driving. The 200, upgraded to a four-seater, improves practicality, making it suitable for school runs, grocery shopping, and even occasional family outings. Its body is noticeably larger, providing better stability on highways. The battery capacity has been upgraded from 10 kWh to 17 kWh, significantly reducing range anxiety. The difference in power is quite noticeable, with the 200 feeling less sluggish during acceleration from a standstill. The upgrades in features are quite considerate—for a small price increase, you get leather seats and a central touchscreen. However, due to its increased weight, the 200's actual power consumption is slightly higher than the 100's.

[Franklin]

The differences are mainly concentrated in three aspects: space layout, range performance, and positioning scenarios. The 100 is a two-door, two-seater microcar, an excellent commuting tool but with limited practicality; the 200 transforms into a four-seater hatchback, capable of temporarily carrying passengers in the rear seats. The 100 has a battery capacity of around 11 kWh, which may not achieve 100 kilometers in winter; the 200 boasts a 20 kWh battery, capable of sustaining over 150 kilometers. In terms of usage scenarios, the 100 is suitable for single-person short-distance commuting, while the 200 can serve as a family's second car. The 200's 30KW motor offers more power reserve, and the battery drains less quickly when using air conditioning. The tire size also upgrades from the 100's 12-inch to 14-inch, significantly improving the driving experience.