
The difference between motorcycle ABS and CBS is that ABS prevents wheel lock-up, while CBS shortens braking distance; ABS has better safety performance than CBS; ABS is more expensive than CBS. ABS stands for Anti-lock Braking System. Its function is to automatically control the braking force during vehicle braking, preventing the wheels from locking up and maintaining a state of rolling and sliding, ensuring maximum adhesion between the wheels and the ground. CBS stands for Combined Braking System, which means the front and rear wheels of the motorcycle can be braked together. Braking both wheels simultaneously ensures maximum friction between the tires and the ground, allowing the motorcycle to achieve the shortest braking distance. The ABS braking system can prevent wheel lock-up, so vehicles equipped with ABS are less likely to skid or lose control during emergency braking, offering higher safety performance. The CBS system can also prevent loss of control to some extent, but its main function is to shorten the braking distance. Therefore, vehicles equipped with CBS have lower safety performance compared to those with ABS. Typically, vehicles equipped with ABS are high-end models and are more expensive, while those equipped with CBS are usually mid-to-low-end models and are slightly cheaper.

The core difference between motorcycle ABS and CBS lies in the distinct safety issues they address. ABS (Anti-lock Braking System) primarily prevents wheel lock-up and skidding during hard braking, especially maintaining directional control when suddenly braking on wet or snowy surfaces. CBS (Combined Braking System), on the other hand, automatically distributes appropriate braking force to the front brake when only the rear brake is applied, reducing the risk of tipping over caused by improper operation by beginners. ABS excels in handling stability issues during emergencies, while CBS simplifies the operational difficulty of daily riding. For example, in rainy cornering situations, ABS prevents sideslip and loss of control, whereas CBS makes braking more effortless in areas with frequent stops at traffic lights. The two systems can actually coexist, and now mid-to-high-end models often feature both, but ABS contributes more significantly to safety improvements.

From a practical riding experience perspective, ABS and CBS are entirely different configurations in separate dimensions. ABS acts like an emergency responder, specifically addressing issues of fishtailing and loss of directional control caused by wheel lock-up. I deeply appreciated this while descending a mountain road—with ABS, the rear wheel doesn't bounce during emergency braking, and the bike remains much more stable. CBS, on the other hand, is more like an intelligent assistant for beginners, especially during urban commuting. It allows for smooth stops at red lights by simply applying the rear brake, eliminating the need to frantically balance front and rear braking force distribution. However, CBS has limited effectiveness on gravel roads, whereas ABS is more universally applicable across various road conditions. If budget is limited, prioritize ABS—after all, anti-lock braking can be lifesaving in critical moments.

The underlying logic of the two systems is fundamentally different. ABS monitors wheel speed and automatically applies intermittent braking to prevent lock-up, while CBS mechanically or electronically links the front and rear brakes. Once, when I test-rode my friend's sport naked bike without ABS, the rear wheel skidded sideways during hard braking. In contrast, an ABS-equipped bike lets you feel the brake lever pulsating while maintaining directional control. CBS models, like scooters, allow smooth deceleration by simply pressing the rear brake—perfect for grocery runs or school pickups. However, CBS offers limited assistance during high-speed riding, where ABS becomes the critical anti-crash technology. Current regulations are promoting ABS adoption, with Europe mandating it on all new motorcycles above 125cc.


