···
Log in / Register

Should I buy the Xingyue L with dual-clutch or AT?

6Answers
VonDawson
09/08/2025, 11:45:07 PM

There is no significant difference between the dual-clutch and AT versions of the Xingyue L. Below is the relevant introduction: Geely Xingyue: As the first product of Geely brand built on the CMA basic modular architecture, the Geely Xingyue is positioned as a high-end sports SUV, belonging to Geely's premium series. It features the Zhiqing 2.0T turbocharged engine + Aisin 8AT strong sports performance, achieving 0-100km/h acceleration in 6.8 seconds. The Xingyue is a high-end sports SUV and Geely's new flagship SUV established with technology. Exterior: The Xingyue adopts the "Dynamic Moment" design concept, drawing inspiration from life and nature based on "Time Racing Aesthetics," capturing the most dynamic moments and incorporating visually dynamic characteristics into static elements. The Xingyue is a sports SUV that achieves perfect balance, balancing the fastback styling with usable space, and balancing sports handling with ride comfort. The Geely Xingyue comes in seven colors: Zeus White, Knight Black, Glacier Silver, Thunder Gray, Hera Red, Neptune Blue, and Xingyue Gold.

Was this review help?
103
Share
TuckerRose
09/20/2025, 04:33:04 AM

As a young car enthusiast who enjoys fast driving, I paid special attention to the driving experience when purchasing a car. The Xingyue L's dual-clutch transmission (DCT) offers quick gear shifts and exhilarating acceleration, delivering a thrilling racing-like sensation that's perfect for lane changes in the city or overtaking on highways. The automatic transmission (AT) provides smoother operation with no jerking during acceleration, though it feels slightly slower to respond. Based on my experience, if you prioritize strong acceleration and fuel efficiency in daily driving, the DCT is the right choice. However, AT feels more comfortable in stop-and-go traffic. Additionally, DCT may occasionally exhibit minor issues like slight shuddering at low speeds after prolonged use, but overall it doesn't diminish the fun factor. I recommend test driving both to experience the acceleration differences before making your decision.

Was this review help?
16
Share
Expand All
VanZachary
11/03/2025, 09:08:23 PM

Our family uses the car frequently, with kids and elderly on board, so safety and comfort are top priorities. The Geely Xingyue L's automatic transmission (AT) delivers an ultra-smooth ride with almost no vibration during gear shifts, preventing motion sickness for elderly passengers—perfect for long trips or outings with children. While dual-clutch transmissions (DCT) are more fuel-efficient, they can exhibit minor jerks in stop-and-go city traffic, causing discomfort over time. Price is another consideration: the AT variant costs slightly more but offers better durability and lower maintenance worries, whereas DCT requires more frequent upkeep. Overall, for family users, we recommend opting for the AT—it ensures a more reassuring drive and minimizes future hassles.

Was this review help?
19
Share
Expand All
EllieLee
12/17/2025, 09:08:28 PM

As a budget-conscious car owner, I prioritize cost and efficiency. The Starry L's dual-clutch transmission (DCT) excels in fuel economy, saving a significant amount on daily fuel expenses, making it particularly suitable for commuters who frequently travel long distances. The automatic transmission (AT) has a simpler structure and is less prone to failures, but its fuel consumption is slightly higher, which may impact long-term expenses. Considering the Starry L's configuration, the DCT has a lower initial cost, but requires more careful maintenance, especially in congested areas where it's prone to wear. The AT is more expensive upfront but offers hassle-free maintenance in the long run. I recommend choosing based on your driving habits: opt for the DCT for better fuel savings if you drive in good road conditions, or go for the AT for peace of mind in chaotic traffic.

Was this review help?
20
Share
Expand All
AdrianaMarie
02/06/2026, 09:52:59 PM

With over a decade of experience driving various vehicles, I've learned to prioritize reliability. The Geely Xingyue L's automatic transmission (AT) is as durable as an old friend, with a mature structure and fewer malfunctions, making it especially suitable for stop-and-go city traffic without any jerking issues. While dual-clutch transmissions (DCT) offer quick response and aggressive acceleration, they tend to wear out faster in harsh weather or frequent stop-and-go conditions, potentially leading to higher maintenance costs in the long run. My advice is not to focus solely on performance when choosing a car—consider daily driving stability: AT's smoothness makes driving more enjoyable, whereas DCT is better suited for occasional spirited driving. Don’t forget to check user reviews, as most people rate AT as more stable.

Was this review help?
7
Share
Expand All
LeAaron
05/02/2026, 01:25:12 PM

As a car enthusiast, I'm really into analyzing technical details. The Xingyue L's dual-clutch transmission uses a dual-clutch design, offering fast gear shifts, high fuel efficiency, and a sporty driving feel, but its complex design might lead to minor issues; the automatic transmission is based on a traditional structure, providing smooth gear changes, low noise, and is suitable for beginners or those who prioritize comfort. From a driving experience perspective, the DCT offers more aggressive acceleration at startup, while the AT is more effortless for long-distance driving. I recommend you test drive both first for comparison: if you often drive on highways, choose the DCT for some fun; if you mostly drive in the city, the AT's reliability can reduce future hassles. Considering the overall usage scenario is crucial.

Was this review help?
1
Share
Expand All
More Q&A

What did the US car companies produce during World War I?

During World War I, U.S. car companies primarily shifted production to military vehicles and engines. Cadillac supplied the U.S. Army with approximately 2,300 staff cars, 1,100 V8 engines for artillery tractors, and vast quantities of munitions like mortar shells. General Motors' GMC division delivered over 13,000 of its Model 16 ¾-ton trucks , which served as standard cargo haulers and ambulances. This transition marked a pivotal moment where American automotive manufacturing prowess was directly applied to modern warfare. The U.S. entry into the war in 1917 created an urgent demand for standardized, reliable motorized transport. The American Expeditionary Forces needed to overcome the static trench warfare paradigm, and trucks were essential for logistics. Cadillac, already renowned for its precision engineering and V8 engines, adapted its luxury automobile production lines. Beyond the staff cars used by officers, its powerful V8 engines were repurposed to power artillery tractors, which hauled heavy guns like the French 75mm field gun across muddy, shell-cratered battlefields. GMC’s contribution was even larger in scale. The U.S. War Department standardized the GMC Model 16 due to its robust design and reliability. The production of over 13,000 units represented a massive logistical undertaking. These trucks performed countless duties: transporting troops, hauling supplies from railheads to the front lines, and serving as mobile medical stations. Many were fitted with stretcher brackets and medical equipment, converting them into ambulances that evacuated countless wounded soldiers. Other manufacturers also contributed significantly. Ford Motor Company produced the Model T ambulance, and its Eagle-class anti-submarine patrol boats for the Navy. Packard manufactured Liberty aircraft engines under license, and White Motor Company built trucks. The collective output is quantified in the table below, illustrating the scale of production for key companies and products: Company Primary WWI Product Estimated Quantity Produced for U.S. Military Key Role Cadillac Staff Cars, V8 Engines 2,300 cars, 1,100+ engines Officer transport, artillery tractor propulsion GMC Model 16 ¾-ton Truck Over 13,000 units Standard cargo/utility truck, ambulance Ford Model T Ambulance, Marine Engines Thousands of units Medical evacuation, naval patrol craft Packard Liberty L-12 Aircraft Engines Produced under license Powering aircraft like the DH-4 bomber This industrial mobilization had lasting effects. It proved the reliability of American automotive engineering under harsh conditions and provided manufacturers with valuable experience in mass production and standardization. The technical lessons learned, particularly in engine durability and vehicle ruggedness, directly influenced post-war civilian truck and car design. The war effort cemented the automobile's role as an indispensable tool for modern society and military operations.
181
Share

Can a US citizen rent a car in London?

Yes, a US citizen can rent a car in London with a valid US driver's license, passport, and credit card. While not always a legal mandate, securing an International Driving Permit is strongly advised to prevent potential issues with UK rental agents or police. The primary requirements are straightforward. You must present a full, valid US driver's license that you have held for at least 12 months. The main driver must be at least 21 years old, but major rental companies like Avis, Hertz, and Enterprise often enforce a minimum age of 23 or 25 for certain vehicle categories . A standard policy across major agencies is a surcharge for drivers under 25, typically ranging from £15 to £40 per day. A credit card in the driver's name for the security deposit is mandatory; debit cards or cash are generally not accepted for this hold. Rental Company Standard Minimum Age Young Driver Surcharge (Under 25) License Held Minimum Enterprise 21 Applies, approx. £25/day 1 year Avis 23 Applies, approx. £30/day 1 year Hertz 20 Applies, approx. £28/day 1 year An International Driving Permit (IDP) is a critical document. It serves as an official translation of your US license. UK law does not require it for short-term visitors, but nearly all major rental companies include it as a non-negotiable condition in their rental agreement . Being without one can result in a refused vehicle. Obtain it from AAA or the National Auto Club in the US before your trip. Driving in London means adapting to left-hand traffic. This requires focused attention, especially at roundabouts and when making turns. Opting for a compact or smaller car is not just a money-saving tip; it's practical for navigating the city's famously narrow streets and tighter parking spaces. An automatic transmission vehicle, while more expensive to rent, can significantly reduce driver stress by eliminating gear-shifting with the opposite hand. Insurance is included in the rental cost, but understanding the coverage is key. The base package covers Third-Party liability. You will be offered Collision Damage Waiver (CDW) and Theft Protection. These reduce your financial liability but often come with a high excess (deductible) of £1,000 or more. To avoid a large bill for minor damage, many renters purchase excess reduction insurance from a third-party provider before traveling, which is typically more cost-effective than buying it at the rental counter. Finally, plan for additional costs like the Congestion Charge if driving within central London on weekdays, and the Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) charge if your rental car does not meet strict emissions standards. Most modern rental fleet cars are ULEZ-compliant, but always confirm this with the rental company directly to avoid unexpected fines.
216
Share

How much are US tariffs on Japanese cars?

The standard US tariff on imported Japanese passenger cars is 2.5% . However, most Japanese cars sold in the US are not subject to this rate due to production location. The commonly cited 25% tariff on some imported vehicles and 15% rate on auto parts are not blanket tariffs on Japanese cars but stem from specific trade actions against China (Section 301) and do not apply to vehicles made in Japan. The critical factors are the car's country of assembly and the origin of its components. For a vehicle to be imported duty-free into the US under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), it must meet Rules of Origin requiring 75% of its components to be made in North America. Most Japanese-brand cars sold in the US are manufactured in North American plants (e.g., in the US, Canada, or Mexico) and thus enter the market with zero import tariff . For example, a Toyota Camry built in Kentucky or a Honda CR-V built in Ohio faces no import duty. Cars fully assembled in Japan and imported to the US are subject to the standard Most Favored Nation (MFN) tariff rate of 2.5% for passenger vehicles. This rate has been consistent for decades under World Trade Organization rules. The higher 25% tariff on certain imports is a separate Section 301 measure specifically targeting goods from China. Since Japan is not subject to these 301 tariffs, a Japanese-made Subaru Forester or Lexus LC500 imported from Japan incurs only the 2.5% duty. The 15% tariff figure often mentioned relates to a subset of auto parts under the same China-specific Section 301 actions. It does not apply to parts sourced from Japan for US assembly. However, broader Section 232 tariffs on steel (25%) and aluminum (10%) imported from many countries, including Japan, increase production costs for all automakers with US operations, indirectly affecting final vehicle pricing. Vehicle/Component Scenario Applicable US Tariff Rate Key Determining Factor Japanese-brand car assembled in North America 0% USMCA Rules of Origin (≥75% regional content) Passenger car fully assembled in Japan 2.5% Standard MFN tariff rate Trucks & SUVs assembled in Japan (historical) 25% "Chicken Tax" on light trucks (largely irrelevant now due to North American production) Certain auto parts from China 15% Section 301 tariffs on China Steel & Aluminum imports (production input) 25% (Steel), 10% (Aluminum) Section 232 national security tariffs Therefore, the direct tariff cost on a Japanese car for a US consumer is primarily determined by where it was built, not the brand. The dominance of North American production for volume models means the effective tariff for most buyers is zero. The significant tariffs in headlines (25% on vehicles, 15% on parts) are China-focused trade policy tools, not rates applied to Japanese automotive trade.
278
Share

When was the first motorized car made in America?

The first successful gasoline-powered automobile built and driven in the United States was the Duryea Motor Wagon, road-tested on September 21, 1893 , by brothers Charles and Frank Duryea in Springfield, Massachusetts. This marks the birth of the American gasoline car, preceding Henry Ford's work and leading directly to the first commercial auto company. While earlier experiments existed, the Duryea vehicle is historically significant for its successful integration of a functional internal combustion engine into a practical road vehicle. Their creation was a modified horse-drawn buggy fitted with a 4 horsepower, single-cylinder gasoline engine . This test run proved the viability of gasoline-powered personal transportation on American roads. The brothers' work culminated in the founding of the Duryea Motor Wagon Company in 1896, which also made the first known sale of a gasoline-powered automobile in the U.S. that same year . This transition from a one-off prototype to a commercial manufacturer is a critical milestone, establishing the automobile as a marketable commodity. It's important to distinguish between gasoline and other early powertrains. The first successful American-made electric vehicle was built by William Morrison in 1891 , demonstrating that different automotive technologies were developing in parallel. However, the gasoline engine's range and refueling practicality eventually led to its market dominance. The timeline below clarifies key events and corrects common misconceptions: Event Date Key Detail First U.S. Electric Vehicle 1891 Built by William Morrison in Des Moines, Iowa. First U.S. Gasoline Car Test September 21, 1893 Duryea brothers' successful road test in Springfield, MA. First U.S. Auto Company Founded 1896 The Duryea Motor Wagon Company. First U.S. Gasoline Car Sale 1896 Transaction completed by the Duryea company. Henry Ford's First Car Built 1896 The Quadricycle, completed in Detroit. Some automotive historians note that the Duryeas' development work began in 1892, but the documented, successful road test remains the definitive 1893 date. Henry Ford's monumental impact on mass production came later, with the Model T introduced in 1908, over a decade after the Duryeas' pioneering drive.
227
Share

What do Americans call car bonnets?

In American English, the front metal cover of a car is called a “hood.” The British term “bonnet” is almost never used in everyday US speech. This linguistic difference is a clear marker of regional automotive vocabulary, with “hood” being the standard term across all 50 states for accessing the engine bay. The distinction is well-documented in linguistic studies and automotive literature. For instance, major American publishers like Haynes and Chilton use “hood” exclusively in their repair manuals. Data from Google Ngram Viewer, which analyzes millions of printed texts, shows “car hood” is over 100 times more frequent in American English than “car bonnet.” This isn’t just a matter of slang; it’s the correct technical term used in parts catalogs, dealership communications, and legal documents like vehicle titles. The function remains identical: the hood is a hinged panel that provides access to the engine, radiator, battery, and other critical components. It is typically released by a latch inside the car’s cabin and secured with a secondary safety catch. When discussing car maintenance or issues, Americans will always use phrases like “pop the hood,” “look under the hood,” or “hood latch.” A quick comparison clarifies the regional terminology: Component American English Term British English Term Front engine cover Hood Bonnet Rear storage compartment Trunk Boot Front directional light Turn signal / Blinker Indicator Windshield Windshield Windscreen Understanding this terminology is crucial for following repair guides, purchasing parts online, or communicating effectively with mechanics in the US. Using “bonnet” might be understood in context, but it immediately identifies the speaker as using British English or being unfamiliar with American automotive culture. The consistency of this term across all regions of the United States underscores its role as a fundamental piece of American English vocabulary.
127
Share

What do Americans call a car bonnet?

Americans call a car bonnet a "hood." This is the standard term used across the United States and Canada for the hinged metal panel that covers the engine compartment at the front of a vehicle. The term "bonnet" is primarily used in British English and other Commonwealth countries. The distinction is a classic example of automotive vocabulary differences between American and British English. Using the correct regional term is crucial for clear communication, especially when discussing repairs, purchasing parts, or following instructional manuals. In a U.S. auto parts store or mechanic's shop, asking for a "bonnet" will likely cause confusion, whereas "hood" is universally understood. This linguistic divergence extends beyond just one part. Several common car components have different names across the Atlantic. For clarity, here are key terms: UK English Term US English Term What It Refers To Bonnet Hood Engine cover Boot Trunk Storage compartment at the rear Windscreen Windshield Front window Wing Fender Panel over the wheel arch Indicator Turn Signal / Blinker Directional light Silencer Muffler Exhaust noise reduction part Petrol Gas / Gasoline Fuel Tyre Tire Wheel covering The prevalence of "hood" in North America is reinforced by its use in all official documentation, from vehicle titles and repair manuals to marketing materials from manufacturers like Ford and Chevrolet. Industry data, such as parts catalog searches, shows that "hood" is the exclusive search term used in the U.S. market, with "bonnet" searches being negligible outside of contexts specifically targeting UK imports. For anyone interacting with the automotive industry in North America, defaulting to "hood" is essential. This applies to everyday conversations, online searches for replacement parts, and when describing damage to insurance companies. While enthusiasts of British cars might use "bonnet" in niche circles, the broader market operates on the American lexicon. Understanding these terms prevents misunderstandings and ensures you get the right part or service.
252
Share
Cookie
Cookie Settings
© 2025 Servanan International Pte. Ltd.