
The Renegade has below-average reliability, particularly for early model years (2015-2018) known for significant engine and transmission problems. Post-2020 models show improved reliability, but the vehicle typically requires more frequent and costly maintenance than competitors like the Honda HR-V or Mazda CX-30.
Reliability varies drastically by model year. Industry data from sources like J.D. Power and Consumer Reports consistently show the Renegade scoring low in long-term dependability studies, especially for its initial generations. The core issues are mechanical, not just minor inconveniences.
Model Year Reliability Breakdown:
| Model Years | Key Issues | Reliability Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| 2015-2017 | Severe oil consumption (2.4L engine), erratic 9-speed transmission shifting, electrical faults. | Poor. High risk of major repairs. Best to avoid. |
| 2018-2019 | Persistence of earlier engine/transmission issues, though potentially less severe. Introduction of 1.3L turbo. | Below Average. Consider only with thorough inspection and warranty. |
| 2020-Present | More reliable 1.3L turbo engine standard, refined transmission programming. Fewer major complaints. | Average. The most reliable generation, aligning closer to segment norms. |
The 2.4-liter “Tigershark” engine is the primary culprit in early models. A widespread and documented problem involves excessive oil consumption, sometimes exceeding a quart every 1,000 miles. This can lead to engine damage if not meticulously monitored. The ZF 9-speed automatic transmission was also problematic, characterized by rough shifts, hesitation, and in some cases, complete failure.
Later models equipped with the 1.3-liter turbocharged engine show a marked improvement in powertrain reliability. This engine has not exhibited the same systemic oil consumption issues. While the fundamental 9-speed transmission remains, software updates and refinements have made its operation smoother and more predictable.
Beyond the drivetrain, owners commonly report electrical gremlins. These include malfunctioning backup cameras, issues with the Uconnect infotainment system (freezing or rebooting), and power accessory failures. These are rarely catastrophic but contribute to ownership frustration. Additionally, components like brakes and suspension parts may wear out sooner than expected for the vehicle class.
In terms of longevity, with rigorous and proactive maintenance, a Renegade can typically reach 100,000 to 150,000 miles. Reaching 200,000 miles is less common than with leading Japanese competitors and often requires significant investments in repairs. Maintenance costs are a key consideration; repairpal.com data suggests annual repair costs for a Renegade are higher than the segment average.
Owner feedback highlights a clear dichotomy. Positive reviews overwhelmingly praise its standout boxy styling, genuinely capable Trailhawk trim for light off-roading, and a cabin that feels more spacious than its footprint suggests. Criticisms consistently focus on a lack of refined power, road noise at highway speeds, and mediocre fuel economy, which are trade-offs for its design and capability.
Ultimately, evaluating a Renegade’s reliability requires a year-specific approach. While later models are viable choices, the vehicle’s historical reputation for below-average dependability and higher running costs is well-earned. A careful pre-purchase inspection and securing a comprehensive warranty are strongly advised considerations.

















I’ve had my 2021 Renegade Latitude for about two years now. Honestly, it’s been mostly fine for daily stuff—getting to work, running errands. No big breakdowns. But it’s the little things that add up. My touchscreen will sometimes just go black for a few minutes. The automatic stop-start system is so jerky I turn it off every time I get in. I also notice it drinks more gas than my friend’s similar-sized SUV. It’s fun to drive and I love how it looks, but I’m already thinking my next car will be something less fussy.

As a mechanic, I see these come into the shop. The advice I give is simple: know what you’re . The early ones, 2015 to 2017, are money pits. The 2.4-liter engine burns oil like crazy. We’ve seen engines sludge up and fail because owners didn’t check the dipstick weekly. The nine-speed transmission in those years is clunky; we do a lot of solenoid body and software updates.
The newer ones with the 1.3-liter turbo are much better from a powertrain standpoint. They still have typical FCA electrical issues—bad sensors, glitchy modules. Expect to replace wheel speed sensors and deal with random warning lights. If you want one, get the newest model you can afford and set aside a budget for maintenance. It’s not a “set it and forget it” vehicle.

I was cross-shopping small SUVs and the Renegade’s looks and Trailhawk trim were huge draws. However, after digging into reliability ratings and owner forums, I got concerned. The data shows a clear pattern of problems that seem to cost more to fix than with a or Toyota. For me, a car is a long-term investment. I can’t afford surprise $3,000 repair bills for a transmission.
I decided the unique style and off-road potential weren’t worth the higher risk of headaches. I went with a more conventionally reliable model instead. My advice is to prioritize your must-haves. If cutting-edge style and light off-roading are top priorities, a newer Renegade might work. If low cost of ownership and peace of mind are key, keep looking.

Looking at reliability means thinking long-term. For the Renegade, the true cost isn’t just the purchase price; it’s the schedule and potential repairs. This vehicle demands more attention. Oil changes need to be on time, with the correct specification oil, especially for the turbocharged engines. Transmission fluid services are critical for the 9-speed and should not be skipped.
Brakes tend to wear out faster than average, a common note in owner reviews. Tire replacement can also be more frequent if you use its off-road capability. When major components like an engine mount or a suspension control arm fail, parts and labor costs are typically higher than for a mainstream Asian brand competitor.
Planning to own one past 100,000 miles requires a dedicated maintenance fund. The vehicle’s lower-than-average resale value also reflects the market’s awareness of these reliability concerns. You’re buying character and capability, but the trade-off is a higher total cost of ownership over five to seven years.


