
In California, you are legally required to carry liability at a minimum of $15,000 for injury/death to one person, $30,000 for injury/death to more than one person, and $5,000 for property damage. This is known as 15/30/5 coverage. However, purchasing only the state minimum is often a significant financial risk because these amounts can be quickly exhausted in a serious accident, leaving you personally liable for costs that far exceed your policy limits.
For adequate protection, most financial advisors and insurance agents recommend much higher liability limits. A common recommendation is 100/300/100 coverage. This means $100,000 per person for bodily injury, $300,000 per accident, and $100,000 for property damage. If you have significant assets like a home or savings, you should consider even higher limits or an umbrella policy, which provides additional liability coverage on top of your auto insurance.
Beyond liability, you should seriously consider these coverages:
The right amount of insurance depends on your personal financial situation. The table below outlines common coverage levels and who they typically suit.
| Coverage Type | State Minimum | Recommended Minimum | High-Asset Protection |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bodily Injury Liability (per person) | $15,000 | $100,000 | $250,000+ |
| Bodily Injury Liability (per accident) | $30,000 | $300,000 | $500,000+ |
| Property Damage Liability | $5,000 | $100,000 | $100,000+ |
| Uninsured Motorist Bodily Injury | Not Required | Match Liability Limits | Match Liability Limits |
| Comprehensive & Collision | Not Required | Required if Financed | Based on Vehicle Value |
| Typical Driver Profile | High-risk, budget-only | Average driver with assets | Homeowners, high net worth |
Ultimately, your goal is to transfer risk you cannot afford to bear. While higher limits increase your premium, they provide critical protection against potentially devastating out-of-pocket expenses.

Don't just get the minimum. Those $15,000 limits are a joke in a real accident—an ER visit alone can blow through that. I'd say start with 100/300/100 liability. And absolutely get uninsured motorist coverage; you'd be shocked how many people drive with no insurance here. If you have a car loan or lease, you'll need full coverage anyway. It’s about protecting your wallet, not just your car.

Think of it as asset protection. The state minimums are dangerously low. If you cause an accident and the costs exceed your limits, the other party can sue for your personal assets—your savings, even your house. I increased my liability to 250/500 after a home. It only cost a bit more per month but gives me huge peace of mind. It's a small price for avoiding financial ruin.

My agent broke it down for me simply: match your liability to your net worth. If you have nothing to lose, the minimum might be a risky choice. But if you own a car with any real value or have savings, you need more. Also, don't skip comprehensive coverage. A hit-and-run in a parking lot or a broken windshield from a rock is way more common than a total-loss accident, and it's covered.

California law is the bare minimum, and it's not enough for most people. You need to consider what you're protecting. For liability, 100/300 is a much safer starting point. Then, add uninsured motorist coverage—it's a must. If your car is newer or financed, comprehensive and collision are non-negotiable. For an older car you own outright, you might drop those to save money, but never skimp on liability.


