···
Log in / Register

What are the differences between the front faces of the 2017 and 2015 Highlander models?

6Answers
Genevieve
07/29/2025, 06:58:47 PM

The differences between the front faces of the 2017 and 2015 Highlander models are as follows: 1. Exterior: The 2017 Highlander features an inverted trapezoidal grille design with a larger area, paired with sleek headlights, giving it a more muscular appearance. 2. Interior: The 2017 Toyota Highlander has significantly improved interior craftsmanship, featuring a three-spoke steering wheel design and a small LCD screen on the center console. The center console also incorporates extensive silver chrome accents and integrates Apple CarPlay or Android Auto systems. 3. Safety Features: The 2017 Highlander is equipped with forward collision warning, automatic emergency braking, lane departure warning, lane keeping assist, and adaptive cruise control. Additionally, except for the LE and LE Plus versions, it includes a blind spot warning system alongside the cross-traffic alert.

Was this review help?
101
Share
BraxtonLee
08/15/2025, 08:45:43 PM

I previously drove a 2015 Highlander and later tried the 2017 model—the front-end differences were quite noticeable. The 2017 model's grille is significantly larger than the 2015's, wider and more aggressive, with a sharper design, while the 2015's grille is narrower and more conventional, lacking some visual impact. The headlights also saw major changes: the 2017 version features sleeker, more elongated lines with LED daytime running lights, making them strikingly bright at night, whereas the 2015's headlights are rounder and more conservative, primarily using traditional halogen bulbs. The bumper was redesigned too—the 2017 model adjusted the fog light area and air intake placement, giving the front end a sportier, more modern look, while the 2015 appears plainer. These updates weren't just cosmetic; they also slightly improved aerodynamics, reducing drag at high speeds. As a longtime owner, I think the 2017 refresh made the car look more stylish and potentially boosted resale value, but the core functionality remains similar—both models drive solidly.

Was this review help?
5
Share
Expand All
SanMarley
10/18/2025, 02:04:48 AM

I carefully examined the differences between the front facades of these two generations of Highlanders at the auto show. At first glance, the grille styles are distinct—the 2015 model features a moderately sized, relatively understated grille, while the 2017 version expands to nearly dominate the entire front, with sharp angles delivering a stronger visual impact. The headlight redesign is also notable, with the 2017 model incorporating LED elements and a more aggressive shape, somewhat reminiscent of Toyota's family design language at the time. In contrast, the 2015 headlights have a softer, more utilitarian profile but lack standout features. The lower bumper area was similarly updated, with the 2017 fog lights adopting a cleaner design, paired with a new intake layout that gives the entire front end a more youthful and dynamic appearance. These subtle changes in details not only enhance aesthetics but also reflect technological advancements, such as potentially improved lighting efficiency. For someone like me who keeps an eye on trends, the 2017 front fascia clearly represents a significant evolutionary step—it's even something to show off at gatherings for that fresh appeal.

Was this review help?
6
Share
Expand All
DelJuliet
12/01/2025, 01:44:21 AM

When choosing a car, I compared the front ends of the 2015 and 2017 Highlander models. The 2017 version has a noticeably larger grille, giving it a more imposing presence, while the 2015 model appears more modest and conventional. The headlight designs also differ—the 2017 version features a more modern look with LED elements, whereas the 2015 version has a rounded, traditional design. The bumper was updated too, with the 2017 model's fog light area sporting a sleeker new shape. However, in practical driving conditions, the lighting differences don’t significantly impact safety, as both provide ample brightness. Overall, the front-end updates make the 2017 model look fresher and more dynamic, while the 2015 version remains reliable and durable—a solid choice for families, with minor changes that don’t affect daily functionality.

Was this review help?
6
Share
Expand All
DelColeman
01/21/2026, 03:06:06 AM

The front face of the 2017 Highlander is absolutely stunning! The grille is super large and cool, ten times more handsome than the small grille of the 2015 model. The headlight design is much sharper, with added LED decorations that shine brightly, while the 2015 model's lights look too old-fashioned. The bumper and fog lights have also been redesigned, making the 2017 front face full of dynamism and definitely eye-catching on the road, completely outshining the more plain-looking 2015 model. Young people love this updated design for being trendier and more exciting.

Was this review help?
12
Share
Expand All
Jenkins
04/17/2026, 03:21:55 AM

From a repair perspective, the front-end components of the 2015 and 2017 Highlander models are incompatible. The grilles are completely different in design and size, with the 2017 version being significantly enlarged, so replacement parts must match the specific year. The headlight contours became more elongated in the 2017 model, possibly using additional mounting points, while the 2015 version features rounder shapes with simpler connections. Changes to the lower bumper affect fog light positioning, requiring model-specific parts to avoid incorrect installation. Though subtle, these design differences may create inconveniences and increase costs during maintenance or modifications. As a user, part availability should be considered.

Was this review help?
2
Share
Expand All
More Q&A

What is the Ford EcoSport?

Ford EcoSport is the Ford Ecosport. The following is an introduction to the Ford Ecosport: 1. Exterior: The Ecosport adopts a family-oriented design with a muscular front face, and the large-mouth grille also exudes a strong presence. The side profile is relatively compact, and the externally mounted spare tire on the rear gives it a friendly touch, making it quite distinctive among SUVs in this segment. 2. Interior: The Ecosport does not feature exaggerated designs, and the layout is also very compact. It comes equipped with an 8-inch floating LCD screen, which is quite satisfactory for its price range. 3. Features: Practical configurations such as leather seats, automatic air conditioning, sunroof, and CarPlay are available, but they are only included in the higher or top trim models. However, the base models are also equipped with basic safety features and offer the option to install a central control screen.
111
Share

How Long Does It Take to Learn Manual Transmission Subject 2 Before Taking the Test?

The required practice hours for Subject 2 vary depending on the type of driving license being applied for. For C1 and C2 licenses, the practice times for Subject 2 are 16 hours and 14 hours, respectively. Below is more related information: Subject 2 Practice Time: 1. According to regulations, you can schedule the test once the required practice hours are completed. However, the actual time needed also depends on the individual's situation. Some candidates may have weaker skills, and even after completing the 16 hours, their driving technique and psychological readiness may still not meet the standard. To pass Subject 2, they may need to add more practice hours. 2. For the C1 license, the regulations require 16 hours of practice for Subject 2, with a maximum of 4 hours per day. Thus, the fastest completion time is 4 days. Additionally, after completing the required hours, there is an approval process, which typically takes 3-7 days, though faster approvals may take 1-2 working days. Overall, the earliest you can schedule the Subject 2 test is about a week.
116
Share

What is the 0-100 km/h acceleration time of the RS5?

The 2020 Audi RS5 Sportback has a 0-100 km/h acceleration time of 3.76 seconds, while the RS5 Coupe version achieves it in 3.68 seconds. Additionally, both cars exhibit excellent posture during full braking from 100 km/h, with ample support from the front suspension. Their braking distances are 35.54 meters and 37.47 meters, respectively. Below is a related introduction: Power: The tested 2020 Audi RS5 comes in two models—the Coupe version and the Sportback version. Both are powered by a 2.9L V6 twin-turbocharged engine, delivering a maximum power of 450 horsepower and a peak torque of 600 Nm. The transmission used is a ZF 8-speed automatic manual gearbox. Features: The new car boasts more exaggerated aerodynamic kits compared to the factory version, with a carbon fiber front splitter and sharp air blades on both sides of the front bumper. The low suspension and wide-body design create a visual effect akin to flying close to the ground.
108
Share

What are the differences between the Talagon and Viloran?

The Talagon and Viloran differ in terms of wheelbase performance and seating features. Below are the key distinctions between the two models: Wheelbase Performance: Both vehicles are similarly large in size, but the Viloran has a clear advantage in wheelbase. With a 3180mm wheelbase, the Viloran surpasses the Talagon by a full 200mm. This extra wheelbase means the third row in the Viloran is no longer just for children—even adults can find a comfortable seating position. Seating: The Talagon primarily offers a 6-seat configuration, with a focus on the second-row seats as the premium 'C-position.' However, compared to the Viloran, the Talagon's second-row seats fall short. The Viloran includes all the features found in the Talagon's second-row seats and adds extras like pneumatic lumbar support, winged comfort headrests, seat ventilation, and electric leg rests—features absent in the Talagon. To facilitate second-row space adjustments, the Viloran also includes a 'boss button' on the front passenger seat, and the addition of reading lights ensures even more comprehensive care for second-row passengers.
109
Share

What are the differences between the M8 and GL8?

The Buick GL8, positioned as a joint-venture brand, comes with a higher price tag, while the Trumpchi M8 offers better value for money. If you have a relatively limited budget, the Trumpchi M8 would be a more suitable choice. Below is a comparison of the two: Design Comparison: The Trumpchi M8's exterior is divided into the Leader series and Master series, featuring a striking design, especially the Master series, which exudes a strong presence. The Buick GL8, on the other hand, continues with its traditional "fat head fish" design, which appears somewhat ordinary compared to the Trumpchi M8. Size Comparison: The Buick GL8 measures 5238/1878/1776 mm in length, width, and height, with a wheelbase of 3088 mm. The Trumpchi M8 measures 5089/1884/1822 mm, with a wheelbase of 3000 mm. In terms of size, the Buick GL8 holds the advantage. Powertrain Comparison: The Trumpchi M8 is equipped with a 2.0T+8AT powertrain combination, delivering a maximum power of 252 horsepower. The Buick GL8 features a 2.0T+9AT powertrain combination, with a maximum power of 237 horsepower. Based on the data, the Trumpchi M8 has a slight edge in terms of power.
114
Share

What Causes a Truck Not to Consume Diesel Exhaust Fluid (DEF)?

Possible reasons include a damaged DEF pump, clogged DEF lines, or a blocked nozzle. Below are relevant details about DEF usage: 1. Actions to take when discovering a truck isn't consuming DEF: If you notice DEF hasn't been consumed or the vehicle's emission warning light is illuminated, it may indicate the SCR system has stopped functioning (commonly referred to as not "burning" DEF). This issue cannot be resolved through DIY methods and requires immediate professional inspection at a 4S service center. Specific causes may include: damaged DEF pump, clogged DEF lines, or blocked nozzles. 2. Consequences of trucks not consuming DEF: Environmental pollution: Operating diesel vehicles without DEF has severe ecological impacts and violates national regulations. Reduced power: While not directly caused by DEF absence, the engine's electronic control system will forcibly limit torque output when it detects no DEF injection and excessive exhaust pollution. SCR system damage: Prolonged DEF absence may cause crystallization blockages or heat damage to SCR system components like nozzles, lines, and the DEF pump.
110
Share
Cookie
Cookie Settings
© 2025 Servanan International Pte. Ltd.