Differences Between Supercharging and Turbocharging
2 Answers
The differences between supercharging and turbocharging are: 1. Different methods: Supercharging is directly connected to the engine output via a belt, and the moment the engine starts, the supercharger begins transmitting power; turbocharging is driven by the engine's exhaust gases to spin the turbine. 2. Different rotational speeds: Superchargers rotate relatively quickly; turbochargers spin slowly, and their boosting effect is not immediately apparent—they need the engine to reach a certain RPM before they start working effectively. 3. Different linearity in power output: The power source of a supercharger comes from the engine's output, which places a burden on the engine. Small-displacement engines generally do not use supercharging; turbocharging is often installed on small-displacement engines to achieve the goal of high power output from a small displacement.
Both supercharging and turbocharging are methods to make a car more powerful, but they work in completely different ways. I enjoy studying mechanical principles and found that a supercharger is driven by the engine's own crankshaft via a belt, tightly linked to the engine's RPM—step on the gas, and it responds immediately. Turbocharging, on the other hand, is smarter; it harnesses the engine's exhaust gases as free labor, using the exhaust flow to spin the turbine blades and drive the intake fan. The downside is that you have to wait for the exhaust gases to build up enough force to get moving, so there's always a slight delay between pressing the accelerator and actual acceleration. For everyday driving, a supercharger feels smoother in stop-and-go city traffic, while a turbocharger performs better on highways and can even save some fuel. But if you're into modifying cars for speed, I think turbocharging has more potential—swap in a bigger turbo and crank up the boost pressure, and you can double the horsepower!
