Differences Between GLC260 and GLC300?
3 Answers
Here are the differences between GLC260 and GLC300: 1. Different Maximum Horsepower: The maximum horsepower of GLC260 is 197ps; the maximum horsepower of GLC300 is 258ps. 2. Different Maximum Torque: The maximum torque of GLC260 is 320nm; the maximum torque of GLC300 is 370nm. 3. Different 0-100km/h Acceleration Time: The 0-100km/h acceleration time of GLC260 is 8.4 seconds; the 0-100km/h acceleration time of GLC300 is 6.9 seconds. 4. Different Maximum Power: The maximum power of GLC260 is 320 kilowatts; the maximum power of GLC300 is 190 kilowatts.
A few days ago, I drove the Mercedes-Benz GLC260 and 300, and the experience left a deep impression. The GLC260 features a 2.0T tuned engine with around 197 horsepower, offering smooth acceleration and low fuel consumption in urban driving—approximately 8 liters per 100 kilometers. It's ideal for daily commutes or small family use. Switching to the GLC300, the engine is also a 2.0T but with horsepower boosted to 255, delivering much quicker throttle response and accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in under 6 seconds. It provides more stable high-speed overtaking and a more exhilarating driving experience. Price-wise, the GLC260 is several thousand dollars cheaper, making it more accessible, while the top-tier GLC300 offers better configurations at a higher cost. Both models have similar space and sufficient trunk capacity. Maintenance costs are comparable due to their similar engine structures. My recommendation: opt for the GLC260 if you're on a tight budget, as it meets basic needs, but go for the GLC300 if you crave more power—the key difference lies in the driving pleasure.
As the family's primary car, I compared the GLC 260 and 300 and found practicality to be the key factor. The 260 has 197 horsepower, runs quietly and fuel-efficiently in the city, with an average fuel consumption of just over 8 liters per 100 km, making it very economical for school runs or commuting. The 300, with 255 horsepower, offers stronger performance, faster acceleration, and more confidence on long trips or when overtaking, but its fuel consumption rises to 9-10 liters per 100 km, making it slightly more expensive to run. Both cars are the same size, with spacious seating for five and identical trunk capacity. The price difference is tens of thousands, with the 260 starting at a more affordable price, allowing savings to be spent on upgrades like leather seats; the 300 comes with richer high-end configurations. I think the 260 is more economical and practical, while the 300 is better suited for families who frequently travel. Driving stability comes first, and the power boost isn't a must.
