
No, you should not use plus gas (mid-grade octane, typically 89) in any car. Using a higher octane fuel than your engine requires provides no performance or efficiency benefits and is a waste of money. The correct octane rating for your vehicle is specified by the manufacturer and can be found in your owner’s manual or on the fuel door. Using the recommended fuel ensures optimal performance and prevents potential issues.
Octane rating measures a fuel's ability to resist "knocking" or "pinging" – uncontrolled combustion that can damage an engine. High-performance engines with high compression ratios require high-octane fuel (91-93 premium) to prevent this. However, the vast majority of standard engines are designed to run perfectly on 87 octane regular gasoline. Their engine control computers are calibrated for it. Putting in 89 octane won't harm the engine, but it won't "clean" it better or make it run smoother. The detergents in gasoline, which are important for keeping fuel injectors and valves clean, are not tied to the octane rating; both regular and premium fuels from Top Tier detergent gasoline retailers contain effective additive packages.
The following table outlines the appropriate fuel choice based on your vehicle's manufacturer recommendation.
| Manufacturer's Recommended Octane | Recommended Fuel Grade | Rationale & Impact |
|---|---|---|
| 87 (Regular) | 87 Octane Regular | The engine is optimized for this fuel. Using 89 or 93 octane provides zero benefit and increases fuel costs unnecessarily. |
| 89-93 (Premium) | 91-93 Octane Premium | Using 89 octane (plus/mid-grade) in an engine that requires premium can cause the engine computer to retard timing to prevent knocking, resulting in reduced horsepower, lower fuel economy, and potentially increased carbon deposits over time. |
| "Premium Recommended" | 87 Octane is Acceptable | Some modern turbocharged engines (e.g., many Hondas, Fords) are designed to run on 87 octane but will produce maximum horsepower when 93 octane is used. Using 89 octane may offer a minor performance bump over 87, but it's often not cost-effective. |
In short, the best practice is to always follow the manufacturer's guideline. Using plus gas in a car that requires regular is simply paying more for no return. Using it in a car that requires premium can lead to suboptimal performance and should be avoided.

Nah, it's basically throwing money away. My old sedan's manual says 87 is fine, so that's what I use. I tried plus once to see if it made a difference—maybe better mileage or something—and it did absolutely nothing. The guy at the auto parts store confirmed it: if your car doesn't need the higher octane, it can't use it. You're just paying an extra 20 to 50 cents per gallon for no reason. Stick with what's recommended.

As an engineer, the key is the engine's compression ratio. High-performance engines are designed for high-octane fuel to prevent premature detonation, known as knocking. If your car is engineered for regular 87 octane, its engine system is calibrated for that fuel. Introducing 89 octane doesn't change the combustion parameters in a beneficial way. It's a common misconception that higher octane means more power. It doesn't; it just means greater resistance to knocking for engines that need it.

Think of it like this: octane is a knock-preventer, not a performance-enhancer. It's medicine for engines that need it. If your car is healthy on regular gas, giving it "plus" is like taking aspirin for a headache you don't have. It won't hurt you, but it's a pointless expense. The only time you should consider a grade higher than recommended is if you hear audible pinging or knocking while accelerating, which indicates a mechanical problem that better fuel might temporarily mask, but not fix.

I just leased a new turbocharged car, and the manual says "Premium fuel (91 octane or higher) is recommended for maximum performance." The dealer told me I could use 87 in a pinch, but the car would be a bit slower and might get worse gas mileage. So for me, using 89 octane "plus" gas is a bit of a middle ground. It's probably better than 87 but not ideal. Since I want the full performance I'm paying for, I stick with 93. For a car that explicitly requires only 87, plus gas is an unnecessary upgrade.


