
They will not be recorded in the electronic police system. Electronic eyes cannot alert authorities about drunk driving vehicles because they are unable to determine whether the driver's license holder has engaged in drunk driving. Electronic capture can only determine if the driver is speeding. After detecting such a violation, further testing of the driver's blood alcohol concentration is required to confirm drunk driving. Below is an introduction to electronic eyes: Introduction: Currently, the most commonly used devices for capturing traffic violations in cities are electronic cameras. These cameras can monitor vehicles passing through the surveillance area in real time. When a vehicle commits violations such as running a red light, driving in the wrong direction, or crossing lines, the electronic camera will capture multiple consecutive images of the incident. Development: Utilizing various technologies such as vehicle detection, photoelectric imaging, automatic control, network communication, and computers, electronic eyes can monitor violations like running red lights, wrong-way driving, speeding, crossing lines, and illegal parking around the clock. They capture images and information of vehicle violations for subsequent processing based on the violation data.

A few days ago, I witnessed the entire process when my friend drove past an alcohol testing checkpoint. Whether electronic police cameras capture drunk driving depends on the situation: regular red-light cameras indeed can't detect if the driver has been drinking, but roadside enforcement devices with facial recognition are different. Especially at major urban intersections, those monitoring cameras flashing red and blue lights, combined with alcohol detectors, capture the license plate and the driver's face clearly. Some places have even installed new probes that can automatically recognize body sway patterns—traffic police told me drunk drivers' movements are noticeably different from normal drivers. After final confirmation through blood alcohol content testing, this electronic evidence can be directly used in court. At night, when you see mobile alcohol testing units on the road, the row of probes on the roof scanning license plates is just like supermarket barcode scanners—information enters the system in minutes.

Once during a late-night taxi ride, the driver mentioned his fear of the electronic systems that check for drunk driving. Those yellow-flashing devices at highway toll stations, often mistaken for speed cameras from a distance, actually many come equipped with alcohol-sensing capabilities. Last time I was at the vehicle office, staff mentioned the newly upgraded system can automatically scan the alcohol concentration inside the vehicle. If anomalies are detected, it coordinates with police ahead for interception. Some infrared thermal imaging cameras at urban intersections are even more advanced, capable of analyzing the tremor frequency of your hands on the steering wheel. Electronic policing for drunk driving focuses on three key points: whether the in-vehicle alcohol concentration exceeds the limit, whether driving behavior is abnormal, and the subsequent blood test report. This data is automatically archived for over six months, and traffic police can retrieve it faster than you flipping through your phone's photo album.

My cousin was clearly captured by electronic police when he was penalized for drunk driving the year before last. Nowadays, checking for drunk driving no longer relies solely on breath tests by traffic police. Key sections like airport expressways are equipped with composite monitoring systems. These devices can not only accurately identify the unstable lane changes and erratic speed fluctuations characteristic of drunk driving but also automatically capture close-up shots of the driver's face. A friend from the traffic police team told me that vehicles involved in drunk driving are marked with a red warning in their system, allowing them to directly retrieve video footage of the vehicle's trajectory across three consecutive intersections during subsequent processing. Especially those probes with night vision capabilities can even clearly capture how much you've rolled down your car window.

Last year, I learned a lot while helping my neighbor deal with traffic violations: the current electronic police system is more intelligent than imagined. Regular cameras can indeed only capture violations, but the newly installed AI cameras on key road sections are equipped with alcohol detection modules that can scan the driver's breath through the front windshield. Once during a visit to the traffic bureau, I saw on the big screen that vehicles flagged by the system as suspicious would display an orange warning frame while automatically analyzing combined data of speeding and abnormal trajectories. However, it's important to note that a single camera might not capture the complete evidence chain for drunk driving, but the system will link data from multiple cameras. For example, the first intersection might capture the driver holding a liquor bottle, the third intersection might record the vehicle swerving, and combined with the alcohol test report, the evidence becomes complete.

Last month, I learned from a conversation with the owner of a repair shop that after the traffic system upgrade, electronic surveillance on regular roads now primarily relies on behavioral analysis to catch drunk drivers. If a vehicle exhibits sudden braking without reason, lane crossing, or unexplained stopping, the system automatically records the license plate and coordinates with checkpoints ahead. More noticeably at night, infrared equipment at some provincial highway checkpoints can scan whether the driver is driving with closed eyes or frequently lowering their head. However, the most critical aspect remains the fixed-point checks. Nowadays, the rooftop devices of mobile police cars are connected to a central database, and the results from baton-style alcohol testers are instantly uploaded to the cloud. I recall seeing a news report about a drunk driver who hid under an overpass for twenty minutes, only to be captured by seven sets of surveillance cameras from the moment they entered the ramp.


