
If you discover that a newly purchased car has been repainted and it has been verified, generally, minor repainting does not qualify for triple compensation. Triple compensation is only applicable in cases of severe accidents or particularly serious fraudulent behavior by the dealer. Methods to determine if a car is new include: 1. Check the manufacturing date: The vehicle's manufacturing date should match the date on the certificate of conformity, which is usually difficult to alter. If the manufacturing date exceeds 15 days, it is considered an old car. 2. Inspect the brake discs: Most modern small passenger vehicles use disc brakes (at least for the front brakes), making the brake discs a reliable indicator. Typically, after driving more than 200 kilometers, the brake pads will leave noticeable marks on the brake discs. There is usually a 1-2 mm gap between the brake pads and the outer edge of the brake discs. After a certain distance of driving, a noticeable "ledge" (very low in new cars) will form on the outer edge of the brake discs.

Well, I have to say something about this issue. From a legal perspective, if you find out that a newly purchased car has been repainted without the dealer informing you in advance, this could very well constitute consumer fraud. According to the Consumer Rights Protection Law, if you can prove that they intentionally concealed information—for example, hiding accident repairs to sell the car at a higher price—you could theoretically claim triple compensation. However, the reality is more complicated. Repainting isn’t necessarily a major issue; it might just be a minor scratch that was simply fixed. The key lies in proving fraudulent intent. Without sufficient evidence, it’s difficult to successfully claim compensation. I’ve seen many cases where complaints led to negotiated settlements, with some compensation awarded but far from triple the amount. My advice is to bring someone knowledgeable to thoroughly inspect the car’s paint before purchasing, checking for color discrepancies or signs of repainting, or to review the vehicle’s factory records. This can help you avoid a lot of trouble.

As a consumer, I once bought a brand-new car and discovered after a week that the trunk lid had been repainted, which was quite obvious. When I confronted the 4S dealership, they claimed it was a minor flaw addressed before leaving the factory and didn't constitute fraud, ultimately only replacing the part. In most cases, repainting on a new car doesn't directly trigger the 'triple compensation' rule, as that requires severe fraud, such as selling a used accident car as new. In reality, dealers often argue it's normal repair work, and negotiations usually result in a refund or minor compensation. You need to gather evidence: take photos and videos, obtain third-party inspection reports. If you genuinely seek compensation, file complaints with consumer associations or take legal action. Repainting itself doesn't affect the car's performance, but inspecting the paint's gloss before purchase is crucial—don't just judge by appearance to avoid future regrets.

From a sales perspective, I understand that dealers sometimes perform minor repairs on new cars to enhance their visual appeal. If customers discover this and raise concerns, we can explain it as factory adjustments to avoid triple compensation. However, concealing major repairs like covering up accidents may constitute fraud, triggering legal penalties. Consumer protection laws stipulate triple compensation for fraud, but the challenge lies in proving malicious intent. Minor touch-ups don't warrant triple compensation; negotiated settlements are more common. It's recommended that buyers proactively inquire about the vehicle's body condition and retain communication records when purchasing a car.


