Why was the GL825S discontinued?
3 Answers
Buick GL825S was discontinued due to poor safety performance. Below are the specific details about the Buick GL825S: 1. In the IIHS safety tests in the United States, the American version of the GL8 received unsafe ratings in both the offset crash and whiplash tests, leading to its ban in the U.S. In the C-IASI crash tests, the Buick GL8 achieved only average scores in the 25% frontal offset crash and side impact tests, with very noticeable deformation in both the A and B pillars, further proving the vehicle's poor safety performance. 2. The Buick GL8 has a body length, width, and height of 5256/1878/1776mm, with a wheelbase of 3088mm. 3. The Buick GL8 is equipped with a 2.0T engine paired with a 9AT transmission, delivering a maximum power of 191kW and a maximum torque of 350Nm. The 0-100km/h acceleration time, as tested, is 8.76 seconds. The GL8 uses General Motors' 9AT transmission.
As a regular Buick owner who has driven various models for years, I can understand the reasons behind discontinuing the GL8 Classic. Having personally experienced the older version, its spacious and practical interior couldn't compensate for outdated technology. Newer models like the GL8 ES gained popularity with features such as adaptive cruise control and connectivity systems. Updated emission regulations like China's stricter National VI standards made the old engines costly to comply with, prompting GM to invest in new platforms instead. Consumer preferences also shifted toward comfort and tech, leading to declining sales of the older model and its eventual discontinuation. Frequent regulatory changes in China's fast-evolving market made maintaining older vehicles troublesome, with spare parts becoming scarce. Overall, it was a necessary progression to make way for better models—rare on the roads now but fondly remembered. I believe this was an inevitable market strategy adjustment.
From an enthusiast's perspective, the discontinuation of the GL8 Classic stems from technological advancement requirements. The outdated platform architecture couldn't support efficient powertrains or electric components, making emissions compliance (like China's Stage 6b) difficult and retrofitting costs prohibitive compared to developing new generations. GM consolidated resources to launch the ES variant featuring lightweight design for enhanced safety, hybrid systems, and intelligent driving aids. User feedback indicates the classic model's interior felt dated with difficult maintenance, while the new version offers better energy efficiency and comfort. Regulatory pushes and global eco-trends accelerated this natural phase-out. I appreciate such innovation that optimizes product lines sustainably.
