Why was the Baojun RM-5 discontinued?

[VonEverly]

A vehicle's driving distance should primarily be measured by the total mileage, while the trip meter is merely a convenience feature for the owner to display recent kilometers traveled and fuel consumption, among other information. Below is an introduction to fuel consumption-related content: 1. Fuel consumption: The fuel consumption of large-displacement vehicles is as high as that of family cars. 2. Comparison: A fuel consumption of 6 liters per 100 kilometers. On the same route, a 1.6L Octavia consumes 7 liters. Sports cars typically require much larger throttle inputs than street cars, leading to higher fuel consumption. For example, a liter-class sports car during aggressive acceleration or high-speed driving can have fuel consumption comparable to a 3.0L car's combined fuel consumption. 3. Fuel: Most cars use gasoline, so the energy content of the fuel is the same. The Octavia's relatively high fuel consumption stems from its high aerodynamic drag, compact structure limiting fuel-saving technologies, and a design philosophy focused on high-revving power output.

[McJameson]

As an automotive enthusiast, I've been closely following the developments of the Baojun RM-5. Its discontinuation was primarily due to failing to meet sales targets and the rapidly changing market conditions. This MPV featured a stylish design and spacious interior, making it ideal for family use. However, it faced stiff competition from more popular models like the BYD Song MAX, which also boasted more advanced powertrains. Additionally, with the current wave of electrification, Baojun has shifted its focus to new energy vehicles such as the KiWi EV, rendering the RM-5 somewhat outdated. Having test-driven it myself, I noticed its relatively high fuel consumption, and user feedback frequently mentioned minor transmission issues, which affected its reputation. The discontinuation is part of a strategic realignment to free up resources for newer products. While it's a pity, adapting to industry trends is a wise move.

[PenelopeMarie]

I've driven for several years and have some thoughts on the discontinuation of the Baojun RM-5. The main reason is poor sales—my neighbor bought one and said repairs were troublesome with hard-to-find parts, plus the fuel consumption wasn't low. Nowadays, people prefer SUVs or hybrid vehicles, leading to a shrinking MPV market. Baojun probably found the costs high and profits thin, hence the discontinuation. As an ordinary car owner, I'm concerned about the depreciation of older models, but companies need to make money, and discontinuing allows them to focus on new projects. My advice to owners is to maintain their vehicles well to extend their lifespan.

[MacReese]

With over a decade of experience in car repairs, I suspect the discontinuation of the Baojun RM-5 was due to frequent malfunctions. Common issues include electronic system failures and lagging infotainment screens, which are time-consuming and costly to repair. With numerous customer complaints, the company likely decided to halt production for upgrades after receiving feedback. The market competition is fierce, and other brands' MPVs are more durable, making Baojun's shift to new energy vehicles a more cost-effective strategy.