Why is the Vision more fuel-efficient than the Emgrand?

[KeiraRose]

Because the Vision is lighter. Related explanation: 1. Principle: Under the same road conditions, engine, and transmission, the heavier the car, the greater its fuel consumption. The curb weight of the Vision is 1210kg, while the Emgrand weighs 1250kg, so the Vision is more fuel-efficient by comparison. 2. Extension: Whether a car is fuel-efficient not only depends on its hardware but also has a lot to do with the driver's habits and road conditions. To reduce fuel consumption, it's necessary to regularly clean the engine's carbon deposits, as excessive carbon buildup can increase fuel consumption and even cause engine knocking.

[JaceFitz]

As a friend who frequently engages in car modifications, I've found that the Vision is more fuel-efficient than the Emgrand primarily due to optimized engine and overall vehicle design. The Vision's engine typically has a smaller displacement and incorporates fuel-saving technologies, such as tuning that prioritizes economy, reducing unnecessary fuel consumption. In contrast, the Emgrand, as a more premium model, usually comes with a higher-horsepower engine, which delivers stronger performance but also consumes more fuel. The weight difference between the two vehicles is significant—the Emgrand has a heavier body and a higher drag coefficient, requiring more energy to propel, indirectly increasing fuel consumption. The Vision's CVT transmission offers more precise control, keeping the engine within the optimal RPM range to avoid waste. Based on personal experience, the Vision feels more agile in city driving, with quick and effortless starts that don’t sacrifice fuel efficiency. I also recommend maintaining proper tire pressure and regular oil changes to sustain low fuel consumption, which can save a considerable amount of money over time and is more environmentally friendly.

[RafaelMarie]

When chatting with my neighbors, we all agreed that the Vision is indeed more fuel-efficient than the Emgrand, as our families often swap cars for daily use. Using the Vision as my daily commuter, I found it particularly smooth in city traffic with frequent stop-and-go situations. The engine starts steadily without dragging, naturally leading to lower fuel consumption. On the other hand, the Emgrand offers more features and a more comfortable ride, but it's noticeably heavier, especially consuming more fuel during highway cruising. I believe this difference stems from their design orientations: the Vision focuses on practicality with a lighter body and optimized fuel lines, while the Emgrand leans towards luxury, where additional features come at the cost of higher fuel consumption. Fuel efficiency is crucial for family budgets, and the Vision saves me dozens of yuan on gas each month. I always remind my friends to avoid sudden acceleration and to regulate the air conditioning temperature, as these small habits make a significant difference in the long run, benefiting both fuel economy and vehicle maintenance.

[Ashlyn]

As a young person who enjoys driving for leisure, I pay attention to fuel consumption because it helps me save money and enjoy longer trips. The Vision is more fuel-efficient than the Emgrand, primarily due to its more efficient and lightweight powertrain, a lighter body that reduces drag, and an engine tuned for fuel economy. The Emgrand, on the other hand, has more horsepower but higher fuel consumption, especially noticeable on uphill sections. I believe car models are designed for different audiences—the Vision is suitable for daily commuting, keeping fuel consumption within a reasonable range, and doesn’t cause anxiety on long trips. I’ve also observed that driving habits have a significant impact; smooth driving makes the Vision perform even better, avoiding unnecessary fuel waste from sudden braking.