
Reasons for the Tiggo 5x being unpopular include insufficient space and high fuel consumption. Insufficient space: The space in the Chery Tiggo 5x is relatively average, and the trunk space is genuinely not sufficient. It feels like a compact model forcibly made into a small one. However, since it's mainly used for commuting and occasional outings, the impact isn't significant and is acceptable. The workmanship and quality control need improvement. The driver's side door handle and the knee-contact area of the center console may produce strange noises if accidentally pressed too hard, raising concerns about potential detachment during use. High fuel consumption of the Tiggo 5x: The acceleration is somewhat sluggish, climbing hills is strenuous, and the speed increase is also a bit slow. It should be fine for commuting in the city, but it struggles on highways and uphill drives. Additionally, there are strange noises during acceleration.

I think the reason why the Tiggo 5x is unpopular is mainly because it's at a disadvantage in the market competition. The SUV market is now crowded with strong competitors like the Haval H6 and the Changan CS75, and Chery's brand appeal is already relatively weak—consumers tend to favor brands with better reputations. Additionally, the 5x's design lacks innovation; its exterior looks somewhat outdated, and the interior uses a lot of plastic materials, making it feel like driving an old car after a while. On top of that, its marketing hasn't kept up, with minimal advertising investment and low online discussion, so many people aren't even aware of it. I also test-drove it, and the performance was mediocre, with high fuel consumption in city traffic, which isn't friendly to budget-conscious users. Overall, this car offers poor value for money—you can get more practical models at the same price point, so it's no surprise its sales are sluggish.

As a family user, I prioritize practicality and reliability, but the Tiggo 5x falls short in terms of space and durability. The rear seats are noticeably cramped when seating three people, and the trunk is too small, making it difficult to pack luggage for trips. More critically, there are quality issues—friends have complained about frequent minor problems, such as occasional electrical system failures, which cost a lot to repair. Its fuel consumption is higher than average for its SUV class, increasing long-distance travel costs. Compared to rivals like the Geely Binyue or BYD Yuan, the 5x's features are outdated, lacking smart driving assistance, which makes it less appealing to younger buyers. Although the price is affordable, the after-sales network coverage is insufficient, making it hard to find service centers in small towns, reducing convenience. Overall, these shortcomings have hurt its reputation and limited its popularity.

Budget-conscious consumers may find the Tiggo 5x lacking in options. Price-wise, it's slightly higher than the Haval M6 but offers no functional advantages, with a simple interior devoid of tech appeal and basic navigation and entertainment systems. Having driven it a few times, I felt the handling response was weak, with sluggish steering that's not suited for urban conditions. Brand-wise, Chery is overshadowed by other major domestic automakers, with younger buyers preferring Changan or Great Wall. Actual fuel consumption is on the high side, making it uneconomical in traffic jams. For compact SUVs at the same price point, the Baojun 510 or Wuling Hongguang S3 offer better space and reputation. This combination of factors makes the 5x struggle to stand out, resulting in lukewarm market response.

From my observation, the unpopularity of the Tiggo 5x is related to its misaligned market positioning. It targets the mid-to-low end segment but lacks standout features, with a conservative exterior design that doesn't align with the latest trends. The marketing department's efforts are insufficient, producing dull advertisements and generating little buzz on social media, leaving consumers with few opportunities to learn about it. I've also noticed an underdeveloped after-sales system, with complicated warranty policies and lengthy repair times, leading to declining user satisfaction. The outdated powertrain, featuring a 1.5L engine with sluggish acceleration and poor high-speed overtaking capability, further diminishes its appeal. In contrast, competitors like the GAC Trumpchi GS3, which updates frequently, offers stable performance, and maintains reasonable pricing, have successfully attracted customers. Reliability issues, such as short battery lifespan, add to ownership costs. These accumulated shortcomings make it difficult to sell.


