Why is the Subject 2 Driving Test So Strict?
4 Answers
For both drivers and others, stricter driving tests are beneficial. Road conditions are becoming increasingly complex and variable. The stricter the test, the higher the requirements for drivers, ensuring safer driving after obtaining the license. Introduction to Subject 2: Subject 2, also known as the small road test, is part of the motor vehicle driver's license assessment and refers to the field driving skills test. Objectives of Subject 2: To master the basic driving operation essentials and possess fundamental vehicle control abilities; to proficiently grasp the basic methods of field and road driving within the test area, and to have the capability to reasonably use vehicle control components and accurately control the spatial position of the vehicle, ensuring precise control over the vehicle's position, speed, and route.
When I took the Subject 2 driving test, I found it particularly strict, mainly because it's directly related to our daily safety. When driving on the road, especially for maneuvers like parallel parking, a moment of carelessness by a novice driver can lead to accidents. The rigorous testing helps cultivate good habits in us, such as checking mirrors and controlling speed, so we won't panic when facing emergencies on the road later. The traffic accident rate in our country isn't low, and many are caused by beginners lacking solid foundational skills. That's why the traffic police department emphasizes thorough testing in Subject 2 – to prevent tragedies. From a long-term perspective, this strictness actually brings peace of mind. Passing means you've essentially mastered those essential skills, unlike some who get their license but still dare not drive. In short, the test isn't strict to make things difficult; it's genuine tempering to ensure everyone can travel safely.
The strictness of Subject 2 (Parking and Reversing) is understandable because it's about taking responsibility for road safety. As a frequent driver, I've witnessed too many accidents caused by novices—reversing into walls or scraping others' cars while parking, turning minor issues into major disasters. If the test were lenient, people would easily overlook details like forgetting to adjust the steering wheel or mistakenly hitting the accelerator. By enforcing strict standards and forcing trainees to practice repeatedly, these problems can be prevented at the root. At driving school, I saw how meticulous examiners were—even a one-centimeter deviation in angle would cost points. It may sound harsh, but it genuinely helps ingrain the correct operations. When actually driving, these habits can be lifesavers. Simply put, it's about clarity—strictness benefits everyone to avoid future troubles.
I think the strictness of Subject 2 is a good thing as it can improve overall driving standards. The test items, such as hill-start parking or right-angle turns, simulate real road conditions and force people to practice thoroughly. If people pass too easily, they may become careless when driving, leading to frequent accidents. This test is like a gatekeeper—being strict ensures everyone develops a cautious driving attitude from the start. In practice, I've observed that trainees cultivated under strict testing conditions have significantly lower accident rates. In short, this method is reliable, and ensuring road safety is the core goal.
