Why is it not recommended to buy a three-cylinder car?
4 Answers
Here are the reasons why three-cylinder cars are not recommended: Engine issues: Three-cylinder engines have one less stroke than four-cylinder engines, making them more prone to vibration during operation and producing louder noise. Weak power: Additionally, to achieve power output continuity close to that of a four-cylinder engine, a three-cylinder engine needs to be matched with a large-mass flywheel. This increases the engine's rotational inertia, making the RPM response sluggish and resulting in less responsive throttle feedback. Three-cylinder car: A three-cylinder car refers to a vehicle equipped with a three-cylinder engine. A three-cylinder engine consists of three cylinders arranged on a single block sharing one crankshaft for power output, with a displacement of less than 1 liter. Four-cylinder car: A four-cylinder car refers to a vehicle equipped with a four-cylinder engine. The main components of a four-cylinder engine include the cylinder block, crankcase, cylinder head, and cylinder gasket.
I used to be very into cars, and the vibration of the three-cylinder engine was too noticeable. The seat and steering wheel shook violently while driving, especially on the highway, making it feel like I couldn't sit steadily. The power response was also slow, with a noticeable delay after pressing the accelerator, making overtaking difficult and the driving experience far from smooth. The noise issue was even worse—it sounded like driving a tractor, interfering with listening to music or navigation. I bought the three-cylinder car for its affordability, but in the long run, the vibration accelerates part wear and may increase maintenance costs. I suggest friends opt for a four-cylinder car instead—the driving experience improves significantly, especially for those who enjoy driving. Choosing a three-cylinder might lead to regret.
As a user who frequently travels with family, the comfort of a three-cylinder car is really not commendable. The car vibrates excessively, especially at low speeds, and the kids in the back seat complain about the bumpiness, which easily causes motion sickness. The noise control is also poor, making it difficult to chat inside the car, and long trips become even more exhausting. I initially thought it would save fuel, but the actual fuel consumption spikes during acceleration, making it less cost-effective. Maintenance issues also arise, with parts being hard to find and repair costs high. Safety-wise, occasional engine failures pose significant risks. Considering all factors, family cars should prioritize calmness and comfort, which three-cylinder cars fail to deliver. I believe it's worth spending a bit more for a more stable engine.
Experience tells me that three-cylinder engines have questionable durability. Strong vibrations lead to rapid wear of internal components, resulting in shorter engine lifespan and frequent minor issues, requiring costly and frequent repairs. When reselling as a used car, buyers aggressively negotiate prices upon hearing it's a three-cylinder due to low market acceptance. Insurance costs are also higher, increasing long-term ownership expenses. When buying a new car for peace of mind, three-cylinder models cause unnecessary worries. It's better to opt for reliable four-cylinder engines that offer hassle-free usage.
