Why does Lynk & Co use three-cylinder engines?

[Paul]

The adoption of three-cylinder engines was actually a necessary compromise for fuel efficiency. Here are the key reasons: 1. Cost considerations: If the Lynk & Co 02 were equipped exclusively with 2.0T engines, production costs would rise significantly. Additionally, the purchase tax would be calculated using the higher 1.6L+ standard. To maintain the same profit margin, this would translate to consumers paying tens of thousands more compared to the 1.5T engine option. 2. Competitive advantage: The introduction of the 1.5T engine allows for more competitive pricing, enhancing its market position against similar products. When priced comparably to Mazda CX-4's 2.0L naturally aspirated two-wheel-drive models, the 1.5T variant offers superior features and a more premium quality experience.

[VanHadley]

I remember asking the salesperson this exact question when test-driving the Lynk & Co 03 with my friend last year. The guy explained that three-cylinder engines are lighter, making the front end more nimble in turns. Plus, with today's upgraded technology, Lynk & Co added a balance shaft and dual-mass flywheel to the engine. I specifically felt the steering wheel at red lights, and the vibration was even less noticeable than my old four-cylinder car. Honestly, automakers use three-cylinders to meet emission standards too - with the same 1.5T displacement, having one less cylinder means about 10% better fuel efficiency. Though I'll admit, the engine sound gets a bit muffled during hard acceleration, but turning up the music covers it. Lynk & Co smartly reinvested the cost savings into smart features, which is exactly why my friend ultimately placed the order for the autonomous driving functions.