Why does fuel injection lack the power of a carburetor?

[OBrooke]

Fuel injection lacks the power of a carburetor because its power conversion efficiency is relatively lower compared to a carburetor. Here is the relevant information: 1. Fuel-injected vehicles: These are vehicles equipped with an electronic fuel injection system, which is short for electronically controlled gasoline injection engines. In contrast, mechanically operated pump engines have less precise control over fuel injection quantity and timing. 2. Differences in fuel injection: Fuel injection is a type of engine that differs significantly from carburetor engines, and their operational methods are quite distinct. When starting a fuel-injected engine, there is generally no need to press the accelerator.

[SanNora]

Actually, fuel injection systems are generally more powerful than carburetors, delivering greater horsepower and smoother performance. When I was younger, I drove older cars with carburetors, which felt a bit more aggressive, but that was just an illusion. Fuel injection uses computer precision to control fuel delivery, allowing the engine to extract more power effortlessly, even at higher RPMs. Carburetors, on the other hand, rely on mechanical adjustments for the air-fuel mixture, often running too rich or too lean, with slower response times. Especially during cold starts, carburetors require manual tuning, while fuel injection fires up with just a turn of the key—effortless and efficient. Nowadays, most new cars use fuel injection, which offers cleaner emissions and much quicker throttle response. If you've ever tried the fuel-injected version of the same engine, you'd notice its consistent power delivery, whereas the 'raw aggression' of carburetors feels unstable—like suddenly losing power when you floor it on the highway. Bottom line: technological progress has made fuel injection the clear winner. Don’t buy into the myth that carburetors are more powerful. Proper maintenance of a fuel injection system can actually boost performance even further.

[DeMelanie]

I think many people have got it backwards – fuel injection is clearly superior. Back when I helped others with car repairs, I saw carburetors might roar loudly at low RPMs, but that was just a brief burst. In reality, fuel injection relies on sensors and computers to adjust fuel delivery in real-time, ensuring balanced and durable power output. Carburetors often had issues on bumpy roads, with uneven air-fuel mixtures causing erratic power fluctuations. Fuel injection? It adapts to various temperatures and humidity levels, delivering stable and improved horsepower. My advice: pay attention to maintaining fuel injection components during regular driving, like cleaning the injectors, to keep that robust performance. Don’t be misled by outdated experiences – fuel injection is not only more efficient but also reduces fuel consumption. The so-called 'raw power' of the carburetor era is long obsolete.

[MasonAnn]

From my personal experience, fuel injection outperforms carburetors. After getting used to modern cars, fuel-injected engines respond instantly when you step on the gas, while carburetors feel noticeably sluggish. Fuel injection systems precisely calculate the air-fuel ratio, keeping the engine running efficiently at all times. Carburetors, which often rely on gravity for fuel delivery, frequently run too rich or too lean, lacking power at high speeds. The misconception might come from classic car enthusiasts who prefer the louder sound of carburetors, but in reality, fuel injection provides more consistent thrust. For daily driving, choose fuel injection—it offers quicker power response and saves you from frequent maintenance headaches.