
Audi S6 is a high-performance sports car, but most Chinese consumers prefer low fuel consumption over high fuel consumption. Additionally, the S6 is positioned as a business vehicle with a relatively high price, which contributes to its limited popularity. Below is an extended introduction: 1. Exterior: The Audi S6 boasts an appearance very similar to the A6L, making it perfect for picking up clients without losing face. Its unique navy blue body color is exclusive to the S6, making it an ideal choice for low-profile business owners. The S6 is built on the standard wheelbase model, giving it a more balanced and compact profile. 2. Front fascia: The S6's front end closely resembles the top-tier A6L. The LED headlights, which are optional on the A6L, come as standard on the S6. The only differences between the two lie in the grille design and the S6 badge—the S6 features a more sporty dual-slat chrome grille.

It's actually quite understandable why the Audi S6 has fewer buyers. Firstly, the car is priced at over 800,000 yuan, which is beyond the consideration of average families for a sedan at this price range—they'd rather buy a Q7 or X5 at the same price for a more impressive look. Secondly, although its performance is excellent, it's too understated in driving, with an appearance not much different from the regular A6, and only car enthusiasts can spot the difference. My neighbor almost bought an S6 but ended up choosing a Porsche Macan, saying the brand recognition is higher and everyone knows it's a luxury car when driven out. Then there's the fuel consumption issue—the 4.0T engine easily consumes 15 liters per 100 km in city driving. With electric cars being so dominant now, naturally fewer people opt for high-performance gasoline cars. Lastly, maintenance is also a hassle, with parts replacement requiring imports, and most ordinary repair shops dare not take on the job.

From an enthusiast's perspective, the Audi S6 feels somewhat stuck in the middle. Driving purists find it not engaging enough compared to rear-wheel-drive cars like the M3; those seeking luxury criticize its interior for being too similar to the standard A6. Priced similarly to the E53 AMG but with weaker brand appeal, the S6 suffers further as Audi's RS series steals the spotlight—when people think performance Audi, the RS6 comes first, leaving the S6 forgotten in between. My car enthusiast friends often call it a 'silent performer'—quick in acceleration but lacking explosive exhaust notes, with less tuning potential than BMW models. Under China's strict National VI-B emissions standards, these high-displacement cars face even tougher challenges, with many dealers reportedly reluctant to stock them.

Young people buy performance cars for the attention they attract, but the S6 looks almost identical to the A6, which costs over 300,000 yuan, and barely stands out on the street. The last time I saw an S6 in a mall parking lot, I wouldn’t have recognized it if not for the brake calipers and quad exhaust. At this price point, young people would rather buy a 718 or a used 911—at least those have a sports car design. As for daily use, the sloping roofline means cramped rear headroom, and the trunk can’t match an SUV’s practicality. With that budget, I’d just get a Model 3 Performance—it does 0-100 km/h in just over 3 seconds and even saves you the purchase tax.

Only after actually owning an S6 do you realize how expensive car maintenance can be. Last time, replacing four original tires cost nearly twenty thousand, and waiting for a front bumper replacement took over a month. The basic maintenance package at the dealership starts at five thousand, and even changing spark plugs requires removing the intake manifold, with labor costs higher than an Audi A8. Fuel consumption is another story—I've driven the older S6 model, and even driving gently in the city gets you 13 L/100km, soaring to 18 in traffic. With that kind of money, you might as well buy a Lexus LS hybrid—the savings on fuel could cover three years of 98-octane gas. Resale value is another pitfall, depreciating by half in three years, far worse than a Porsche in the same price range.


