Which one to choose between Kamiq GT and Honda XR-V?
3 Answers
Comparison between Honda XR-V and Kamiq GT: Dimensions: The Honda XR-V measures 4328mm in length, 1772mm in width, and 1610mm in height; the Kamiq GT measures 4409mm in length, 1781mm in width, and 1606mm in height. Transmission: The Honda XR-V is equipped with a CVT continuously variable transmission; the Kamiq GT comes with a 6-speed automatic manual transmission. Engine: The Honda XR-V is powered by a 1.5L naturally aspirated engine with a maximum power of 96kW and peak torque of 155Nm; the Kamiq GT is powered by a 1.5L naturally aspirated engine with a maximum power of 82kW and peak torque of 145Nm.
I'm also considering these two cars recently, the KAMIQ GT and the Honda XR-V each have their own merits. It depends on your needs: the KAMIQ GT's entry-level configuration is quite practical, with significant discounts available—the top trim can be driven off the lot for less than 150,000 RMB, featuring amenities like a panoramic sunroof and rearview camera. The rear seats are quite spacious, and the German car's chassis feels solid when driving, though the 1.5L engine is a bit underpowered—sufficient for city commuting but struggles when overtaking on highways. The XR-V's 1.5T engine offers much stronger performance, and Honda's space design is truly remarkable—its magic seats can be folded down to accommodate large items with ease. However, the mid-to-low trims lack some detailed configurations like fabric seats compared to the KAMIQ, and the top trim is 20,000 to 30,000 RMB more expensive. After test driving both, I personally feel that if you prioritize power and resale value, go for the XR-V; if you're on a budget but want high-end configurations, choose the KAMIQ.
Having driven my friend's KAMIQ GT and the company's old XR-V, the difference in handling is quite noticeable. The KAMIQ's steering feels heavier, with excellent vibration absorption over speed bumps, but its acceleration is sluggish, especially when overtaking with the AC on—you really have to floor the throttle. The XR-V's throttle response is much quicker, and the Earth Dreams engine delivers a satisfying punch when revved to 4,000 RPM. It feels nimble during lane changes, though the cabin noise and wind roar are more pronounced. In terms of space, the XR-V's trunk is more practical—lower load floor and wider opening make it easy to fit my bike inside. Fuel consumption is similar: the KAMIQ averages around 8L/100km, while the turbocharged XR-V only drinks about 0.5L more. My take? Young drivers craving speed should go for the Honda, but if it's mainly for family commuting, the German ride refinement is more comfortable.