Which is more practical, the Mistra 1.6T or 1.8?
2 Answers
The 1.8T transmission has a slight downshift jerk, which is very minimal and can be ignored; the 1.6T transmission's gear shifts are slightly noticeable, but the throttle response is very powerful. As long as you don't frequently drive in heavy traffic, the 1.6T is better. Turbocharging itself is a mature product, and overall, the 1.6T is more practical. Here is an introduction to the Mistra: 1. In terms of interior, the center console is equipped with an 8-inch LCD display, supporting CarPlay smartphone connectivity, and the air conditioning control area adopts the currently popular piano key design. 2. In terms of power, the Mistra is equipped with 1.8T and 1.6T engines, with maximum power outputs of 143 horsepower and 175 horsepower, and maximum torques of 176 Nm and 265 Nm, respectively. In terms of the transmission system, the 1.8T engine is matched with a 6-speed manual or 6-speed automatic transmission, while the 1.6T engine is paired with a 7-speed dual-clutch transmission.
From a practical daily-use perspective, the 1.8L version is more sensible. I drove a Mistra 1.8 for several years, and it handled city commutes effortlessly. The naturally aspirated engine delivers smooth acceleration without the jerky feeling of turbo lag, making it much more comfortable in traffic jams. In terms of fuel consumption, real-world tests showed around 8L/100km, which is economical and worry-free. As a family car, the Mistra offers spacious interiors and comfortable seats, with simple and affordable maintenance—replacing small parts at a regular repair shop costs just a few hundred yuan. While the 1.6T has quicker acceleration on highways and stronger power, its city fuel consumption rises above 9L/100km, turbo components are costly to maintain, and it may develop more minor issues over time. If you’re not chasing high-speed thrills and mostly drive in the city, the 1.8L is more hassle-free and reliable—it’s a solid choice.
