Which is more fuel-efficient, the H6 or the CS75PLUS?
2 Answers
Compared to the Changan CS75PLUS, the Haval H6 is more fuel-efficient. The comprehensive fuel consumption of the Changan CS75PLUS is 7 liters per 100 kilometers, while the Haval H6's comprehensive fuel consumption is 6 liters. This is because the Haval H6 has a smaller engine displacement, making it relatively more fuel-efficient. Relevant details about the CS75PLUS are as follows: 1. Detail One: The Changan CS75PLUS is positioned as a compact SUV. It offers two engine options for consumers: a 1.8-liter turbocharged engine with a maximum output of 177 horsepower and a peak torque of 230 Nm, and a 2.0-liter naturally aspirated engine with a maximum output of 158 horsepower. These engines are paired with a new-generation Aisin 6-speed automatic transmission and a 6-speed manual transmission, respectively. 2. Detail Two: The front headlights of the car resemble a pair of sharp eyes, giving the vehicle a bold and passionate look. The car features smooth lines and a dynamic stance, along with a spacious interior that provides a comfortable riding experience for passengers.
As a frequent driver, I've driven both the H6 and the CS75PLUS, and both are excellent SUVs. The H6 offers strong power, but its urban fuel consumption is relatively high, reaching up to 10L/100km; on highways, it performs better at around 7.5L. The CS75PLUS performs better in the city, averaging about 8L, and around 6L during highway cruising. I think the CS75PLUS might be more fuel-efficient because it uses the Blue Core engine, which has good technical optimization and high transmission efficiency. If you're an average commuter, choosing the CS75PLUS can save you some fuel costs, but driving habits are also crucial—such as avoiding sudden acceleration and maintaining proper tire pressure, which can further reduce fuel consumption. Paying attention to these details during daily use can help control overall expenses better.
