Which is more fuel-efficient, the Geely Vision or the Arrizo 5?
4 Answers
The fuel consumption of the Vision and the Arrizo 5 is very close, and both models are relatively fuel-efficient. The Vision's fuel consumption is generally around 7-8L per 100 kilometers, while the Arrizo 5's fuel consumption is approximately 8-9L. Here is more information about the 2018 Vision: 1. Model: The model is positioned as a compact car. 2. Body dimensions: The length, width, and height are 4599/1747/1482mm, respectively, with a wheelbase of 2615mm. 3. Powertrain: The entire lineup is equipped with a 1.5L inline 4-cylinder naturally aspirated engine, paired with either a 5-speed manual or a 4-speed automatic transmission. The maximum power is 80KW, the maximum horsepower is 109PS, and the maximum torque is 140N·m.
I've driven the Geely Vision and Arrizo 5 several times, and overall the Arrizo 5 is a bit more fuel-efficient. The Vision averages 7.5L to 8L per 100 kilometers, while the Arrizo 5 can maintain 6.5L to 7L, saving you a few hundred bucks a year on fuel. Why such a big difference? The Arrizo uses a newer CVT transmission, which shifts more smoothly—less throttle input at city traffic lights saves a lot. The Vision has more space but is heavier, consuming more fuel. My suggestion: if you frequently drive on highways, the Arrizo performs more steadily with its lightweight, fuel-efficient engine design. For short city trips, the difference is smaller, but adopting a gentle driving style—avoiding sudden acceleration and hard braking—benefits both cars. Regular maintenance like oil changes and air filter replacements also helps optimize fuel efficiency.
As a frequent driver, I find the Arrizo 5 more fuel-efficient than the Vision. The version of Vision I drive has a fuel consumption of around 8L, while the Arrizo easily drops to 6.8L, saving fuel costs and allowing me to travel dozens of kilometers more. There are many reasons: the Arrizo is lighter, and its turbocharged engine is more efficient; the Vision has a sturdy and comfortable chassis, but its older engine consumes more fuel. Driving habits are crucial—for example, maintaining a steady speed and avoiding sudden braking can lower fuel consumption. The difference isn't significant in city traffic jams, but for long trips, the Arrizo is more cost-effective. Maintenance also matters—keeping tire pressure at the standard level saves fuel. The Arrizo's compact design reduces wind resistance, while the Vision is cheaper but has higher fuel costs. I recommend installing a fuel consumption app to track data and optimize routes.
I've test-driven both cars, and the Arrizo 5 is noticeably more fuel-efficient, averaging around 6.5L, while the Vision consumes over 7L on average. Engine technology is the key factor—the Arrizo's updated engine offers lower fuel consumption. The Vision is reliable with more spacious interiors, but its body is heavier. Proper maintenance, like regular oil changes, helps save fuel. Choosing the Arrizo is more economical.
