Which is more fuel-efficient, the Arrizo 5 or the Vision?

[PeterDella]

The fuel consumption of the Vision and Arrizo 5 is very close, and both models perform well in terms of fuel efficiency. The Vision's fuel consumption is generally around 7-8L per 100km, while the Arrizo 5's fuel consumption is approximately 8-9L per 100km. Below are more details about the 2018 Vision: 1. Model: The car is positioned as a compact sedan. 2. Body dimensions: The length, width, and height are 4599/1747/1482mm, with a wheelbase of 2615mm. 3. Powertrain: The entire lineup is equipped with a 1.5L inline 4-cylinder naturally aspirated engine, paired with either a 5-speed manual or a 4-speed automatic transmission. The maximum power is 80KW, the maximum horsepower is 109PS, and the maximum torque is 140N·m.

[LeBrantley]

I just compared the fuel consumption data of the Arrizo 5 and the Vision. Based on my driving experience, the Arrizo 5 is generally a bit more fuel-efficient. Official data shows its fuel consumption is around 6 liters per 100 kilometers, while the Vision is probably closer to 7 liters. This is mainly because the Arrizo 5 has a smaller engine displacement, using an efficient 1.5L engine, and its lightweight body design also contributes to better fuel economy. Additionally, the Arrizo 5's CVT transmission is well-matched, performing stably in congested urban areas and reducing unnecessary fuel consumption. Although the Vision is also good, its chassis and transmission system are slightly heavier, leading to faster fuel consumption at high speeds. Of course, actual fuel consumption is greatly influenced by individual driving habits—rapid acceleration or using air conditioning can easily increase the numbers. I recommend checking more owner forum feedback before purchasing, as many users share real data that can be very helpful. Overall, based on the data and practical application, the Arrizo 5 stands out between these two models and is worth prioritizing.

[StMason]

As an average car owner, I find the Arrizo 5 more fuel-efficient. On my last 500-kilometer round-trip road trip, a full tank cost me only about 150 yuan, while my friend's Vision required over 170 yuan for the same distance. This difference mainly stems from engine efficiency—the Arrizo 5 accelerates smoothly from low speeds without hesitation, whereas the Vision has slight jerks during acceleration, naturally consuming more fuel. In real-world driving, the Arrizo 5 is effortless on national highways, averaging under 6 liters per 100 km, while the Vision hovers around 7 liters. Many factors influence this, such as maintenance—older cars tend to have higher fuel consumption. I often remind myself to press the accelerator lightly and decelerate early to save even more. Additionally, air conditioning usage has a significant impact; the Vision's AC is noticeably thirstier in summer. Overall, the Arrizo 5 offers better daily practicality and fuel economy, making it ideal for commuters. When choosing a car, test-driving under different road conditions can highlight these differences more clearly.

[MacHaven]

The Arrizo 5 is indeed slightly more fuel-efficient than the Vision, with an average fuel consumption approximately 10% lower. According to professional tests, the official fuel consumption for the Arrizo 5 is 6 liters per 100 kilometers, while the Vision's is 6.7 liters. The gap is even more noticeable in actual city driving. This advantage stems from the Arrizo's advanced engine tuning and lower drag coefficient. Other contributing factors include vehicle weight, as the Arrizo 5's lightweight design reduces burden. Paying attention to tire pressure and regular oil changes can further optimize fuel efficiency. The Vision performs well on highways but has higher idle fuel consumption in urban areas. Overall, the Arrizo 5 excels in fuel economy.