Which is more fuel-efficient, 1.2T or 1.6L?
1 Answers
The 1.6L naturally aspirated engine is definitely more fuel-efficient. Comparatively, the long-term usage cost of turbocharged (T) engines tends to be higher. If you're using it for household purposes without significant power demands, the 1.6L is a better choice. However, in terms of acceleration or power response, the 1.2T paired with a DSG transmission performs better. Naturally aspirated engines are denoted by the letter 'L,' while turbocharged engines are denoted by 'T.' The 1.6L is a naturally aspirated engine, and the 1.2T is a turbocharged engine. Specific differences between the two: Cost: The 1.2T engine is more expensive than the 1.6L engine. Power: Before the turbo engages, the 1.6L engine has stronger power. After the turbo engages, the 1.2T engine outperforms. The 1.2T has a maximum power of 85kW at 5200-5600rpm and a maximum torque of 185N·m at 1500-4000rpm. The 1.6L has a maximum power of 90kW at 6000rpm and a maximum torque of 154N·m at 5200rpm. Fuel consumption: The 1.2T is more fuel-efficient than the 1.6L, saving approximately 1L per 100km. Maintenance costs: The 1.2T is slightly more expensive to maintain than the 1.6L, but the difference isn't significant. Typically, maintenance costs are about 100-200 RMB more. The 1.2T requires 95-octane gasoline, while the 1.6L uses 92-octane. Lifespan: The 1.6L engine has a longer lifespan. Without exaggeration, a naturally aspirated engine can last until scrapping as long as it's regularly maintained, not driven aggressively, and not damaged manually.