Which is more durable, the Tiguan L or the CR-V?
2 Answers
CR-V is more durable. Power: The CR-V is equipped with a 1.5T engine, delivering a maximum power of 193 horsepower and a maximum torque of 243 Nm, paired with a CVT transmission. The Tiguan L is equipped with a 2.0T engine, delivering a maximum power of 186 horsepower and a maximum torque of 320 Nm. Body Dimensions: The latest top-trim Tiguan L measures 4716(mm) in length, 1859(mm) in width, and 1677(mm) in height, with a wheelbase of 2791(mm). The latest top-trim Honda CR-V measures 4621(mm) in length, 1855(mm) in width, and 1689(mm) in height, with a wheelbase of 2660(mm).
I've driven various SUVs for over 20 years, including the Tiguan L and multiple friends' CR-Vs. The Tiguan L offers a decent driving feel with refined interiors, but it started having minor issues after just two years—like frequent engine warning lights and glitchy electronic systems, costing quite a bit in three repairs. As for the Honda CR-V, my friend's model ran for a decade with just routine maintenance and tire changes, never needing a tow, and its engine and transmission remained rock-solid. Honda's mechanical simplicity ensures reliability and durable parts, while VW's electronics are prone to trouble. On long hot-weather drives, the Honda maintained stable temps without breakdowns, whereas the Tiguan twice overheated. For hassle-free durability, the CR-V wins—it's my go-to for family trips, feeling safer and more dependable. It also has more cargo space. Bottom line: from real-world driving experience, the CR-V outperforms the Tiguan L.
