Which is more durable, Baojun 510 AMT or CVT?
2 Answers
In terms of durability, the Baojun 510 AMT and CVT are the same, but the CVT transmission offers a better driving experience compared to the AMT. Body dimensions: The Baojun 510 measures 4220 mm in length, 1740 mm in width, and 1615 mm in height, with a wheelbase of 2550 mm. Among vehicles of the same type, it excels in air conditioning performance. Powertrain: The Baojun 510 is equipped with a 1.5-liter naturally aspirated engine across all variants, delivering 105 horsepower. This engine is paired with a 6-speed manual transmission, a 5-speed AMT transmission, or a CVT transmission.
Having driven for over a decade, I've tried both the AMT and CVT versions of the Baojun 510. In terms of durability, I feel the AMT comes out on top because it's essentially a manual transmission with automatic control—simpler structure, fewer parts, and less prone to breakdowns over time, especially in congested urban traffic with frequent stop-and-go driving. The AMT's clutch has higher durability and longer maintenance intervals. However, its downside is the noticeable gearshift jerkiness, not as smooth as a CVT, and occasionally requiring manual shifting to avoid wear. The CVT uses a belt-and-pulley system, offering ultra-smooth starts and better fuel efficiency on highways. But with long-term use, frequent hard acceleration or heavy loads can lead to belt wear or even slippage, making repairs expensive and troublesome. Based on experience, the AMT is better suited for budget-conscious daily commuters, which aligns with Baojun 510's design philosophy—just remember to check the transmission fluid regularly.
