Which is better, Volkswagen Tharu or Tayron?
2 Answers
Volkswagen Tharu is better, as it appears more upscale. The Volkswagen Tharu and Tayron are sister models. The Tharu's stature is no less impressive than the Teramont, while the Tayron focuses on a more fashionable styling. The Tharu features a standard T-shaped layout that looks very neat, complemented by the use of various soft materials and black decorative panels. Additionally, the brown leather is specially adorned with stitching. The differences between the Tharu and Tayron are as follows: 1. Exterior: The Tharu measures 4453*1841*1632mm in length, width, and height, with a wheelbase of 2680mm; the Tayron measures 4595*1860*1660mm, with a wheelbase of 2731mm. 2. Interior: Both feature a three-spoke multifunction steering wheel and follow Volkswagen's family interior style, but the Tayron includes ambient lighting. 3. Price: The Tayron is more expensive than the Tharu.
I've driven both the Volkswagen Tharu and Tayron multiple times. The Tharu is a compact SUV with a smaller size, making it particularly agile in urban areas, and it has lower fuel consumption. The 1.4T engine is sufficient for daily commuting, and you don't have to worry about tight parking spaces. The Tayron is larger, positioned as a midsize SUV, with more spacious interiors, making it suitable for families or long-distance trips, though its fuel consumption is slightly higher. I think if you're dealing with congested city roads daily and have a limited budget, the Tharu is more cost-effective and hassle-free. If you frequently carry passengers or go on long trips, the Tayron offers better comfort. Both are reliable; it depends on your daily road conditions and needs. With regular maintenance, the upkeep costs for both are similar—don't overcomplicate it.
