Which is better, V6 engine or inline-six?

[EzraFitz]

There is no absolute superiority, as each has its own advantages and disadvantages. The inline-six cylinder engine offers strong power, simple layout, and high stability; the V6 engine provides better smoothness and comfort. Therefore, the choice can be made based on needs: if you prefer handling and power, choose the inline-six; if you prefer comfort, choose the V6. Here is the relevant introduction: 1. The inline-six cylinder engine is structurally simpler, with all cylinders arranged in a straight line, requiring only one cylinder head and one set of double overhead camshafts. 2. The V6 engine is most commonly arranged as two inline-three cylinders at a 60-degree angle, requiring two cylinder heads and two sets of camshafts.

[StPeter]

I've been driving for twenty years and rebuilt countless engines. The biggest difference between V6 and inline-six lies in their structure: a V6 is like two three-cylinders arranged in a V-shape, saving space but requiring balance shafts to reduce vibration; an inline-six has all six cylinders in a straight line, naturally smooth as silk with minimal vibration. BMW sticks with inline-six engines precisely for this smoothness. However, V6 offers more flexible chassis layout and fits better in front-wheel-drive cars like the Teana and Highlander. If you prioritize buttery-smooth power delivery, the inline-six is more satisfying; for practicality and hassle-free ownership, the V6 suits most cars better. I've modified several old Mark X models—that V6 exhaust note is absolutely intoxicating.

[MacCharlotte]

Those who are into car modifications know the temperaments of these two all too well. The inline-six engine block is long, and when adding a turbo, you have to consider the cooling space—fitting twin turbos on a BMW N54 is a real pain. The V6 engine bay has more room to spare, making it much easier to install a supercharger kit. But once modified, the linear output of an inline-six is truly addictive—just look at the GTR's RB26 as an example. For daily use, the V6 is more practical; even changing spark plugs on a Camry is something you can do yourself, whereas the labor costs for an inline-six are significantly higher. I've seen threads on foreign forums where people have modded a 2JZ inline-six to a thousand horsepower, but for us ordinary folks, it's still more practical to go with a widely available V6.

[LeAllie]

From a design principle perspective, the inline-six engine achieves perfect balance in both primary and secondary vibrations, with its crankshaft rotating as precisely as a Swiss watch. Modern V6 engines compensate for vibrations by offsetting connecting rod angles, but subtle vibrations can still be felt in the steering wheel during rapid acceleration. In terms of fuel consumption, the V6's compact structure gives it slightly higher thermal efficiency—for example, Lexus's 2GR engine can reduce fuel consumption to 9 liters. The current trend is shifting back toward inline-six engines, with Mazda's newly developed inline-six paired with a 48V mild hybrid system offering both smoothness and fuel efficiency. The production model set for release next year is highly anticipated.

[DelIsabela]

For regular car owners, choosing a V6 is the right move. When it comes to maintenance, replacing spark plugs in an inline-six requires removing the intake pipe, adding an extra 200 yuan in labor costs; the V6 engine bay offers more space, and swapping the air filter takes just five minutes. In the used car market, older V6 Toyota Mark X models are 30% cheaper than BMWs with inline-six engines from the same year. However, it must be said that the durability of inline-six engines is truly impressive—there are BMWs with 500,000 kilometers that haven’t undergone major repairs, while V6 engines tend to develop oil leaks by around 300,000 kilometers. A note for friends in northern regions: during cold winter starts, the noise from the V6’s overhead camshaft will be slightly louder than that of an inline-six.