Which is Better: Built-in or External Tire Pressure Monitoring?
2 Answers
Tire pressure monitoring systems, whether built-in or external, each have their own advantages and disadvantages, and the choice can be made based on the specific needs of your vehicle. 1. Pros and Cons of Built-in Tire Pressure Monitoring Devices: Pros; Installed inside the tire, using a sensor-equipped valve stem to replace the original one, with minimal exposure outside, not protruding beyond the wheel hub. Once installed, it is essentially a permanent solution (can last over 5 years without issues). Cons: Complex installation process, requiring wheel balancing. 2. Pros and Cons of External Tire Pressure Monitoring Devices: Pros: Easy installation. No need to replace the valve stem, no wheel balancing required, and not even needing to inflate or deflate the tire. All the owner might need to do is screw the sensor onto the valve stem. Cons: Not suitable for SUV models with higher tire pressure. Inflating or deflating requires removing and reinstalling the sensor, and external sensors are prone to damage from foreign objects.
I've been driving for a long time and believe built-in tire pressure monitoring is more reliable. Installed inside the tires, it's unaffected by wind or rain, providing accurate readings without worrying about false alarms compromising safety. Especially when driving on highways or long distances, incorrect tire pressure could lead to blowouts or loss of control. Built-in systems offer earlier warnings, ensuring driving safety. External ones, while easier to install, are prone to damage or theft. When I used an external one, I was always worried about the sensors getting stolen when parked, and they often gave false alarms in summer due to high temperatures. Overall, built-in systems have better durability. Though more expensive and complicated to install, safety is priceless and worth the investment. Regularly checking the tire pressure system during maintenance can enhance vehicle lifespan and fuel efficiency.
